Hunter Biden Laptop Question

[crowmanyclouds]

‘In fact, conversation on the right about this is like, “Hey, what do you mean Comet Pizza doesn’t have a basement? I’ve never heard of a building without a basement. Who’s got the extra mags? We gots to save the childrens from Killary!’

[Skywatcher]

And that hospital ship which docked in NYC this past summer was really to smuggle Killary’s sex slaves out of the tunnels under Central Park.

[crowmanyclouds]

I’ve seen Tweets from a well informed person that can not find Central Park on a map so this clearly is true.

[QuickSilver]

@Sam_Stone

Actually, whatever that document is, it’s not the evidence everyone is talking about. In fact, conversation on the right about this is like, “Hey, what’s this document the Times is talking about? I’ve never heard of it.” They ‘debunked’ a document no one cares about, which had nothing to do with the hard drive evidence or Tony Bobulinski’s evidence, so far as I know.

I can’t believe you’d even try this lame denial given:

@Sam_Stone

Again, there is a witness to this, with documentation and a willingness to testify under oath. That doesn’t mean it’s all true, or that it will matter even if it was, but it certainlg seems to corroborate everything we kiow so far.

@Sam_Stone

Possibly, which is why I added the qualifications. But if the WSJ has all the documents and they don’t say what she says they do, she’d be in big trouble, And I doubt this would have been printed, even on the opinion page, if the documents didn’t line up with what she says.

@Sam_Stone

Because so far they have a trove of documents that the DNI, DOJ and FBI aay are NOT Russian disinformation. Those documents were also given to journalists at the Post and Wall Street Journal. Since then, Tony Bobulinski has turned over thousands of documents and three unlocked phones to the FBI for review.

Still want to claim, “What Documents?”

[k9bfriender]

@QuickSilver

Still want to claim, “What Documents?”

Soon it will also be, “Who’s Tony Bobulinski?”

[Daithi_Lacha]

@Babale

In fact, as a non human, (Trump) can’t even become a naturalized citizen; but regardless, he is intelligible for the office of president.

How did no one pick up on this? Oh, what a giveaway! He’s barely intelligible as it is!

[Babale]

Goddammit autocorrect

[RyanAdam]

@Sam_Stone

In fact, conversation on the right

A correction, the conversation in the far right Trumpist online sewers. Leave “the right” out of this Stone. Those of us who did not bathe and drink from Trumpian and Trump collabo sewage discourse discussed no such things, as some like Lincoln Project knew better than to drink from Russian Intel sewage.

[Guest-starring_Id]

If I hear the name Tony Bobulinksi one more time, I am going to be very, very mad.

[Ludovic]

Tony Bobulinksi

[JohnT]

Bobulinksi! Bobulinksi! Bobulinksi!

[QuickSilver]

…crickets, @Sam_Stone?

[Gyrate]

@JohnT

Bobulinksi! Bobulinksi! Bobulinksi!

Yes?

[Lobohan]

That bird is going to fly to Flavortown for the winter.

[JohnT]

A quick update:

Scott Stedman

[Euphonious_Polemic]

I guess Giuliani was “exaggerating a bit” about the laptop. The same way he was about Michigan votes.

And by “exaggerating”, I mean “telling completely fabricated lies”.

[Kimera757]

I read somewhere that the computer shop owner is visually challenged.

Sympathy eliminated. He’s not running because people know about his shop and is trying to duck the political blowback.

Della Rocca [his lawyer] said he doesn’t anticipate Mac Isaac becoming entangled in a potential lawsuit or criminal investigation

He doesn’t anticipate being entangled in a criminal investigation that his “evidence” supposedly launched.

[eschrodinger]

I wonder what their definition of “entangled” is. Prosecuted? Or a witness? Because there are probably lots of circumstances where he doesn’t get prosecuted or sued. But I don’t see a lot of ways for him not to be a witness – and likely a key one.

[Euphonious_Polemic]

@eschrodinger

But I don’t see a lot of ways for him not to be a witness – and likely a key one.

I see a way.

The whole thing is complete bullshit, and will never, ever see the inside of a courtroom. Allegations will continue to be made by the Q-anon and other conspiracy theorists, of course…

But there will be no need to call witnesses or present any “evidence”. Ever.

[eschrodinger]

Not even if the perpetrators of this fraud are prosecuted or sued? I know it’s bullshit. I’m talking about legal consequences to the perpetrators of it.