I tend to disagree with that. I couldn’t be sure and it’s not impossible that you’re being truthful now, but I tend to think you meant the implication that it had, and were not any sort of innocent victim here.
People in this thread have focused on deconstructing the sentence that you quoted in the OP, but what makes it a bit clearer IMO is the paragraph immediately following the one that you quoted. The fuller quote is as follows:
The two paragraphs should be viewed as a whole, the point of which was that there are all sorts of fools and assholes out there with opinions that you think should be legal but rebutted. There’s nothing in the second paragraph about anyone who is not a fool or asshole, and looks to me you meant this to include everyone in the first paragraph. If this were not so, there was no reason at all to include the “You” in the first paragraph, since the point of this bit was to say that fools and assholes should only be tolerated legally and not otherwise.
That said, if I was a mod I would probably not have warned for this. Too much ambiguity and plausible deniability. A very well done bit of snark.