More precisely, I claimed that I was sure that some would refer to themselves thusly, after you claimed that none would. Seeing as you brought up the issue, and made the stronger claim, it seems to me that the burden of proof lies on you. BTW, there are those that say that they are opposed to choice, even if they don’t use the exact term “anti-choice”.
I am quite tired of your insistence on such an absurd position, despite repeated statements that it is false. That is a completely unfounded, unwarranted, and insulting charge, and I demand that you take it back.
I don’t see how that bears any resemblance to what I quoted.
Again, I demand that you take that back. People who are opposed to legal abortion are opposed to choice. People who are for it are not baby-killers, and your implying that they are is simply unconscionable.
You know, repeating that over and over again doesn’t make it true.
No, it’s not. I have already explained what the point is. Why don’t you deal with the points I have brought up, rather than contiuning your ignorant statements?
That is a complete non sequitor. Not all pro-choice advocates are abortion supportes, and even those that are aren’t anti-life. Promoting abortion is no more anti-life than promoting amputation is ant-leg.
So you admit that they are against choice?