Bring a book. Unless you actually manage to get picked for something interesting, you are probably in for several hours of mind-numbing boredom.
My last jury experience:
8:00 - Arrive, sign-in, sit down and wait.
8:30 - Clerk tells us what to expect.
9:00 - Watch two videos of 1) Basic jury stuff, and 2) A judge thanking us for doing our duty.
9:30 - 11:00 Wait
11:00 - Clerk takes 20 of us (not me) to neighboring city for jury pool there.
12:00 - 1/2 hour lunch
12:30 - Wait some more.
2:00 - Clerk informs us that an upcoming civil suit is going to be selecting a jury. Lawyers for both sides come in and brief all of us. This was mildly interesting.
2:30 - Wait some more
3:00 - A number of us (not me again) selected for interviews on civil case (Case settles out-of-court that night).
4:00 - Go home.
The only time I was called for jury duty (in Gaithersburg, Maryland), I waited 5 hours as 47 people were gone through and the jury and alternates were filled up with only three people left in front of me.
Or do like me: Take a week off work (my employer’s “can’t fail” jury-excusal letter somehow never made it to the clerk" and take the opportunity to see the legal system outside TV.
I wonder if courtrooms in New York and Baltimore are really these beautiful oak-and-leather affairs… here in King County they’re awful veneer, recessed lighting, and mid-range office furniture.
Yeah, bring a book. Something weighty, Russian, and waterproof (hafta leave the building for lunch, and it rains a lot here).
Me, I watched the film Twelve Angry Men three times in the week before the trial. And I got a simple whiplash case. Shoot. But it (the film) was an excellent tutorial in persuasion.
I’m glad I served in that silly little trial. I know I helped keep a shyster and his dimwit client from fleecing a little old lady in a Cadillac for $85,000 in injuries from a 2-mph bumper tickle.
Despite the fact that I had three bleeding-hearts on the jury who wanted to give $60K for “future distress”, I also had one wonderful 85-year old lady named Gladys, who didn’t say much until the final vote. Her statement was something like this:
“well, I know whose car hit whose. But I got in a traffic accident once and hit my head on the windshield. This lady’s purse, you remember, didn’t even fall off the seat. I spent a week in the hospital, and my insurance paid for the damage to my husband’s car.”
Acutally, I have a friend who did that, and it was a great time. The grand jury tends to see much more meaningful cases, and you decide on charges for many, many cases. It feels much more like you are actually making a difference than humdrum civil cases.
Her grand jury pool was for drug crimes. They got a reputation for being “hard”, meaning they actually demanded legal proof that a crime had been committed (NOT illegal searches) before they would agree to charging the defendants.