I am pretty much safe to say that you are a one issue vote, and that one issue is being abortion. Have you ever voted for a pro-choice candidate?
Anyway, I more concerned about her not even considering the test as a gateway to political self evaluation. Tests like the one above should not dictate who you should vote for, but they should at least make you think why you are voting for someone in the first place.
No, they probably mean active duty – while the reserves are military, reservists do not have the full-time commitment of regular troops, and are usually less likely to face combat.
Yes, I voted for Arnold, but in primaries, supporting abortion rights makes it extremely unlikely that I will vote for you.
I consider myself Conservative-Libertarian, I may not like what you do, but if you aren’t bothering anyone you have every right to do it. I would have to look at the test again, but I think that there must have been a few options heavily weighted because of that, such as gay marriage and such.
You don’t vote for any candidates at ALL, silly. You’re supposed to rob everyone there, loot the place, and then set fire to it. That’s how a true Chaotic Evil person votes, with his actions!
My fear is that there are some out there who really believe that by being a “registered Republican” or “registered Democrat”, that they may only cast their ballots for candidates of that particular party.
Huh. I got a 50% match with Bush, and a 46% match with Kerry.
I think when I took this test in 2000 (or one very similar) it had all the 3rd party candidates on it as well. I wonder why they didn’t do that this time?