I pit the dumb fucks in Congress

[QUOTE=Boyo Jim]
I stand corrected, and my apologies to all including Clothahump. I never heard him make this claim during the public comments leading up to the veto.
[/QUOTE]
What a dilemma this is, for a march in step conservative! Do you acknowledge an apology for being called “Dumber than Bush” or do you decline the apology, out of a sure knowledge that being dumber than Bush cannot be an insult in the first place?

Tris

[QUOTE=Triskadecamus]
What a dilemma this is, for a march in step conservative! Do you acknowledge an apology for being called “Dumber than Bush” or do you decline the apology, out of a sure knowledge that being dumber than Bush cannot be an insult in the first place?

Tris
[/QUOTE]

I do acknowledge that athelas, at least, is not dumber than Bush. Otherwise the insult I posted wouldn’t even have been understood.

[QUOTE=Miller]
Clothahump is in a class by himself. He’s the Lance Armstrong of dumb.
[/QUOTE]
hmmmm, now that you mention it, he does seem a little testie.

[QUOTE=Clothahump]
The President is the CiC, NOT the Congress. The Congress attempted to usurp the authority of the President in that bill. Had they managed to override the veto, I would imagine that a lawsuit would immediately have been filed and the bill found to be unconstitutional for that reason.
[/QUOTE]

. . . As has been mentioned before in this thread, Bush’s power as Commander-in-Chief doesn’t entitle him to control absolutely everything about the military, with Congress’ only role to provide him with exactly the money he demands with no strings attached in any way. Congress is an equal branch of government, not the executive’s lapdog.

After 43 posts, no Doper in this thread appears to agree with Clothahump’s interpretation of the Constitution WRT the legislative-executive division of war powers. You won’t find a court of law that will agree with it, either. To find somebody who does, you’ll have to go here.

[QUOTE=Squink]
Sorry to disappoint, but:
[/QUOTE]
Well, jumping Jesus Christ on a pogo stick! I knew Bush was dumb, but even I never imagined he could be as completely retarded as Clothahump.

[QUOTE=Clothahump]
You stupid assholes had no business sending that bill to the President in the first place. All you accomplished by doing so was:

  1. A public demonstration of your ignorance of the Constitution of the United States.
    [/QUOTE]
    Clothy, my boy, I can’t even get mad at what you’re saying, you’re so dumb. I’m just sitting here laughing my ass off.

Look at it this way, for just a sec: would it have been unconstitutional for Congress to have done nothing? But that would have had the same effect, even more so.

[QUOTE=Clothahump]
Congress is so blindly anti-GWB that they are willing to ignore the law.
[/QUOTE]
While writing legislation, uhhuh.

I mean, think about that a second. :stuck_out_tongue:

[QUOTE=RTFirefly]
I knew Bush was dumb, but even I never imagined he could be as completely retarded as Clothahump.
[/QUOTE]
Think about that; have you ever seen them in the same room? Well? :dubious:

Clearly, Clothahump is angling to be Gee Dubya’s next selection when an opening appears on the Supreme Court. Given Bush’s track record of selecting people based not on excellence or even competance, but on boot-licking loyalty to all things Bush, I think Clothahump really has a chance.

[QUOTE=Pochacco]
You know what amazes me about this imperial presidency crap? It never seems to occur to the people spouting it that in slightly less than two years there’s a better than average chance that it’s going to be HILLARY CLINTON wielding that power.

Think about it, Clothahump.

HILLARY CLINTON will be Commander-in-Chief with absolute unfettered power over all aspects of the military and foreign policy. HILLARY CLINTON will be able to eavesdrop at will on anyone who she decides poses a threat to the United States. HILLARY CLINTON will have the power to lock up United States citizens for indefinite periods without a trial, and torture them if she believes it is necessary for national security. HILLARY CLINTON will replace everyone in the Justice Department with left-wing activists who will use the full powers of that Department to harass Republican candidates in every race in the country.

Have fun under the iron heel of our boot!
[/QUOTE]
You’re missing the essential quality of conservative USA: The rules only apply to the other guy.

It’s laughable that Bush would suddenly pretend to care about either the Constitution or the Separation of Powers but be that as it may, the Constitutional objection is a total horseshit smokescreen. The Constitution gives Congress the power to decide when we will or will not go to war as well as control of the purse strings.

This is an example of the kind of conservative perspective that we are frequently warned we are at risk of losing here at the SDMB.

Heaven forfend!

[QUOTE=Frostillicus]
Clearly, Clothahump is angling to be Gee Dubya’s next selection when an opening appears on the Supreme Court. Given Bush’s track record of selecting people based not on excellence or even competance, but on boot-licking loyalty to all things Bush, I think Clothahump really has a chance.
[/QUOTE]

I’m going to deduct 5 points from Gryffindor for misspelling competence when calling someone dumb.

Sorry…carry on.

Sailboat

[QUOTE=Richard Parker]
Sometimes I wonder if **Clothahump **is just a long-running and extremely sophisticated kaufmanesque flame persona.
[/QUOTE]

I sometimes wonder if he is not an extreme leftie deliberately posting idiotically in an effort to make right-wingers look bad.

Has Clothahump ever started a pit thread that wasn’t utterly moronic?

[QUOTE=Colibri]
Has Clothahump ever started a pit thread that wasn’t utterly moronic?
[/QUOTE]

At least he returned (however briefly) to this one to try to defend his view. He usually rushes right off to re-wrap his lips around GWB’s cock and never makes it back to the thread.

[QUOTE=Elysian]
I’m not sure why Congress decided to pass something they knew would absolutely be vetoed.
[/QUOTE]

Maybe they think that funding the war for now (because they think pulling out suddenly would do more harm than good) but with a definite timetable for withdrawal would be prudent policy and in accordance with the will of the American people?

[QUOTE=Miller]
You’ll never catch him, Clothahump is in a class by himself. He’s the Lance Armstrong of dumb.
[/QUOTE]

You appear to be suggesting Clothahump “achieves” his level of dumbosity through natural talent, extremely dedicated training and drugs. I favour the theory that he is pure natural talent.

I don’t like thinking about GWB’s cock :frowning: Can we stop talking about it? :frowning:

Have you seen Cheney’s? You could kill a rhino with that thing.

[QUOTE=Elysian]
I don’t like thinking about GWB’s cock :frowning:
[/QUOTE]

Me either. I mean, it’s allowed the man to reproduce, for Chrissake!

(Just kidding. I’m sure that Jenna and Babs the Lesser are perfectly nice young women.)

If this is a war, and now we we are edging toward spending a trillion dollars fighting a war on terrorism, we must have killed some. What do these terrorisms look like.? When will these terrorisms give up?

[QUOTE=gonzomax]
When will these terrorisms give up?
[/QUOTE]

When we win, silly.