NYT writer Nicholas Kristof is again pushing his shitty and selfish Scrooge-like idea. That of, instead of giving a real gift, one instead “buy your kids a $30 beehive (or an $850 camel) for a needy family through Heifer International”.
Now look, making donations is a great thing. And by and large those are wonderful orgs, who help those truly needy in useful ways.
But- making a donation that makes YOU feel good is not a “gift” to your kids- or anyone else. “I made a donation in your name” just means to me that you’re cheap, thoughtless, and want to force me to go along with your idea of what is a needed social program. It’s cheap as the donor gets the tax deduction and gets the warm feeling from writing the check. What do I get? How is this in any way a gift to your kids or me or anyone else…other than yourself and your chosen charity?
Charitable Contributions are truly a wonderful thing, it’s part of what makes us a Civilized Society. But the fact that you donate $100 to Heifer Intl as you think it’s a great charity and you get the warms feeling from making the donation- does NOT make it a gift to others.
So sure, yeah- break out that checkbook come the season (or better yet- all year around. ) Find a couple of great causes, and support them. Tell your friends, too, yes! But it’s not a “gift”. It does not sub for a thoughtful personalized , wrapped item of gelt/pelf/loot.
Don’t get me wrong- if a couple decides “Well honey, how about this year, instead of buying each other expensive gifts, we give a nice donation to ….?”, then that’s fine. But that’s not a “gift”- it’s what you choose to do instead of a gift.
Hell, a few years ago, the Monterey Bay Aquarium was going to open a Sea Horse exhibit. My SO loves Leafy Seadragons, I love the MBA, so yes, we decided to get a special “plaque on the wall” membership instead of buying each other gifts. And we were both happy. But it wasn’t a “gift”, it was a joint decision to give instead of gifting each other.