Dodge the question of how many innocent people your voter ID hurt to catch a few miscreants.
You don’t care how many people you hurt just so you can get your way. Is that the teaching of Jesus?
Selfishness certainly is a Conservative trait.
Dodge the question again, show what a coward your daddy raised.
Why is it Republicans are such delusional assholes. Didn’t that retard you voted for claim there was a threat of WMD in Iraqi? Why is it you Republicans can only get your way by lying and evading the truth? (you know that thing that Jesus fellow, you claim to follow in craven hypocrisy, wouldn’t want you to do)
You are SO fucking full of shit it’s vile. The man was running off a list of GOALS that they had been working on “for years,” and checking them off the list as “Done.”
[QUOTE=Mike Turzai]
We are focused on making sure that we meet our obligations that we’ve talked about for years:
[ul]
[li]Pro-Second Amendment? The Castle Doctrine is Done.[/li][li]The first Pro-life legislation—abortion facility regulations—in 22, years, Done.[/li][li]Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania—Done.[/ul][/li][/QUOTE]
It’s beneath contempt for you to play stupid and act as if this scam hasn’t finally been exposed to the light of day. We aren’t stupid, but you’re a goddamn imbecile to keep up this fucking charade.
There weren’t 10 last time, and you’re suggesting 10,000. Sell your fantasy scare stories to the gullible. Next time, before you offer to send flowers to the perky breasted skydiving quad, ask for a photo ID.
It’s my position that the solution creates a system whereby we can be confident that the votes cast are from legitimate voters. It’s my further opinion, just reached now, that this scares the shit out of you because you know how much the Democrats value illegal aliens’ and (where not permitted) convicted felons’ votes. In short, a Voter ID system scares you because you know that losing illegal votes hurts the Democrats.
How can we fear something that doesn’t exist? We’re not, by and large, conservatives after all.
I wouldn’t care in the least if you took away all the fraudulent voters. Since they don’t exist, the net impact would be 0. Repeating this over and over, and puttng a fear of it in other’s mouths, demonstrates what an irredeemable piece of shit you are.
Get this through your deceitful skull - there are just as many fraudulent voters as there are skydiving perky breasted dead quadriplegics.
Don’t bother. The next comeback will focus on the fact that he quoted Lobohan and specified “you”, thus his comment wasn’t (necessarily) directed toward all of us (“we”).
Again, friend Dipshit, voter confidence at the cost of 1000+ legitimate voters being disenfranchised for each of the fraudulent voters is something that an idiot would advocate. Especially when said confidence only applies to those that adhere to a conspiracy theory that is promulgated by right-wing news sources.
I don’t think you’re an idiot, so all we’re left with is you being so ugly and evil that you are okay with keeping the poor from voting. Do you think Jesus would be okay with that you fat fucking hypocrite? Or do you think that your table would get flipped over?
Hold up a moment, you sickening wretch, there are no illegal votes. They are a lie that FOX News tells beady-eyed yokels to scare them.
You’re no beady-eyed yokel, friend Bricker, you’re smarter than the hooples. You know your argument is full of shit, but you make it anyway. You do this because you are okay with winning by cheating. Because you think that oppressing a few hundred thousand poor people is funny, because they shouldn’t even get to vote in the first place.
You have a veneer, Bricker. A paper-thin surface that looks to be civility and intellect, but underneath, you’re a boiling mass of maggots.
Gar Alperovitz’s book “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth” includes an excellent account of how the “official/popularly accepted figure” for “how many US soldiers’ lives were spared by not having to invide mainland Japan” gradually increased, without anyone really taking much notice, from something like 5,000 to something like 1 million. It’s fascinating – all it took was for one official (Truman, say, or his then-Sec. of State James Byrnes) to casually mention a figure that was just a little more than the last figure someone mentioned…etc…etc…and now you have a whole generation of Americans who take it as cold hard fact that the atom bombs “saved” many, many US (and Japanese) lives.*
Something similar seems to be going on with the “voter fraud” horseshit figures. Except that this time, only half of the American populace, at most (I hope), is falling for it.
*(This is besides the equally contestable notion that we would have had to invade Japan at all, whatever the causalty figure, had we not dropped the bombs. But that’s tangential to my point here.)
Another proud liberal position. We wouldn’t have had to invade Japan. They were hjust about to be really really sorry for everything they did. They had some consciousness raising right before Hiroshima, and understood that their Phallic Imperialism was Wrong. They were going to participate in Healing Encounters with the comfort women, I bet, but our mean ol’ nasty bomb ruined it all.
Ah, liberals. You guys should kiss the feet of every conservative that makes it possible for you to live you poor, deluded, simple lives. Every conservative that goes to work every day so that you guys are free to sit in coffee shops, read Mother Jones, and apply for NEA grants is a conservative you should be offering to fellate in gratitude.
Then, by all means, let us reinstate the poll tax. Bricker says it is okay.
Smart, but evil. As I say, I don’t think you’re a fool. I think you’re a bad person and that your parents failed utterly to instill in you anything resembling mammalian notions of fairness and decency.
I will note that you still to address the point, your fix for a problem that only exists in the minds of misinformed people makes the problem ten thousand times worse. Thank goodness that the problem is centered among those you don’t think should get a vote.
It’s not a poll tax. You do not have the right, or the power, to define words however you wish. The question of a poll tax is one of law. The Supreme Court has the ultimate power to interpret the law, and they say:
I know you may need help with the big words, so I’ll translate:
Lobohan you fucking tool, it’s not a poll tax. Sincerely, Justice Stevens.
It’s not my area of law, but you guys are convincing me I should volunteer my services to the correct side of this battle. I wonder who I talk to to do that?
I didn’t say it *was *a poll tax. I suggested it was a defacto poll tax.
Also, there are no valid neutral justifications.
You’re deflecting Bricker. Let’s talk some more about how you are such a coward that you don’t address that your solution is thousands of times worse than the problem.
Or how about that you know better, but are willing to offer lip service to a conspiracy theory so that your side can win by cheating.
Or that you have the nerve to call yourself a Christian, yet Christ would zap your fig tree.