You know in a movie when a skinny, weak guy is swinging while the stronger guy is just pushing on his head to keep him out of reach.
Yeah… This is just… not fun.
Go in peace. You’ve suffered enough. <3
P.S. Seriously though, maybe bring a dildo the size of a normal penis and you can alternate off with it. She likes you as a person, and we want this to work.
So, when are you two lovebirds going to stab and make up?
This is the greatest response ever! You actually think I care what you say! You are a moron on a message board. Enjoy your idiocy!
I can only offer the olive branch for so long.
Any answer I give you that you like will be accepted as gospel. Any answer I give you that you don’t like will be disbelieved.
So, yes: every single legal analyst on the planet agrees with me.
Then, equally, I am doing nothing by reacting to these unrealistic goals in similar fashion to how the pro-choice movement reacts to pro-lifers who speak of declaring abortion unconstitutional.
Right?
I doubt anyone is saying you don’t have the right to feel as you choose about whatever you choose.
If they do, you can tell them I said to stop that.
You sound less amused.
Remember when this thread was about Voter ID laws?
Good times.
And, equally, I am not telling anyone that they don’t have the right to feel as they choose about whatever they choose.
But you have made every effort to hector them with your neener-neener comments. Spare us your false illusion of genial probity.
You can’t find a single post of mine in which I “hector” anyone solely for what they feel.
I do respond strongly to people who, in addition to feeling things that aren’t accurate, post those things here. So if you feel, in your heart, that Voter ID is unconstitutional, I am genial indeed. If you POST that Voter ID is unconstitutional, then I will correct you, and if you persist, so will I.
Is that when you drag their lifeless corpse around the city of Troy behind your chariot? Well, I certainly hope not. Even in these nearly ten thousand posts, I doubt I could find an example of that.
You have given the impression of being quite giddy as to the prospect that those who feel differently than you are disappointed in the results and perceived consequences of these laws, however, and that may have been what they were referring to.
Your first post in this thread, for sufficiently broad but not forced definitions of “hector”.
And if not “hector”, several alternative and comparably unflattering verbs can be found.
Trevor Noah makes clear (well, he doesn’t expose it; it was already obvious) how the denial of voting rights to felons is rooted in race.
Former Republican senator Jim DeMint admits voter identification laws are intended to elect more conservatives:
The longer quote also contains the justification that it is all necessary because the Dems are actively encouraging illegal voting.
However, I do not contend that any of this is unConstitutional. Merely unjust, corrupt and kinda rotten.
The word is lie. The same lie **Bricker **has been loyally parroting in this thread for literally years.
Where in tarnation do your ideas come from? Mushrooms? LSD?
I for one would happily support voter ID if it were implemented in a fair fashion, i.e. not by malicious Republiopaths trying to make a mockery of American democracy.
I’ve no idea whether anyone posted that “Voter ID is unconstitutional” — I suspect that you’re distorting what someone wrote. Perhaps something like:
The constitutional right
One Man — One Vote
is violated by malicious laws intended to achieve
One Man likely to vote against the GOP but whom we can harrass — Zero Vote
HTH.
What do you mean you have no idea? You don’t read the threads that you are posting to?
Here’s a direct quote, no distortion.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=19257609&postcount=9075