Yup.
Woo hoo! Winning! You even said so!
Fuck yeah! USA! USA!
Was there a time when you would have been ashamed to applaud an underhanded trick to steal political power? Do you remember?
Reminds me of this:
Only, it’s not the USA who is winning.
Fake Christian, fake patriot. What other things do you only pretend to believe in?
I’d ask him whether his outright glee (not satisfaction at stopping fraud, but jumping up and down cheering) is admitting that he’s in favor of these laws because they help Republicans, but I know what he’d say, so I’m not bothering.
Your intellect.
But I’m really really bad at faking it.
Oh snap!
You’re not particularly convincing in the other stuff you lie about either.
My glee arises from pissing off Lobohan. I’m no more than mildly pleased at the voter ID thing.
Really? Gosh, Lobo, it sure seems like you’re just the just the sort of sensitive soul that could sense these things, aren’t you?
What makes you think I’m pissed off? I find you disgusting, like a bug, or a Scientologist. I don’t hate you, you’re just a symbol of exactly what is wrong with this country. Lazy, vapid, ignorance waddling around on perceived superiority.
In any case, I won the debate, why would I be pissed? You broke down and admitted that you don’t care about right and wrong, and you’re willing to take a win through underhanded means.
If this were an episode of Law and Order, you’re the guy on the stand yelling, “Yeah, I killed him, but he had it coming!”
To his credit, he admits that it is, for some if not all Republicans, a political game to garner undeserved power. He just pretends to believe that the benefits far outweigh the ick factor. And that’s where he gets into trouble, because there is no voter fraud to speak of.
Well, that can be explained away, its because the laws make it so hard to catch voter fraud, which may be rampant, for all we know. The other side of that argument is that it may be non-existent, for all we know. He would like to insinuate and imply that the very lack of evidence somehow supports his case, but he knows better than that. Worse, he trumpets the paltry handful of actual cases as proof, while simultaneously insisting that he can’t get proof, because the Dems have stacked the deck against him. Well, which is it, then? “I can’t get the proof, but here it is anyway!”?
Then there’s the smaller, but telling points, like the restrictions on voter registration and the take back of “Sunday voting”. He has no rationale to explain those away, certainly not “voter fraud”, unless he wants to somehow insinuate that the League of Women Voters = ACORN. So he does what he has to: he ignores them. Probably for the best, considering.
And finally, he falls back to anecdote. Perhaps enough has been said about that. But its kinda like the bad guy in the old Superman shows who fires all his bullets to no effect, and then throws the gun!
So, why the cheering? Because he’s pissed, because you hurt his feelings. In Brickerworld, tighty righty views should be accorded the same respect as sane and reasonable views, because of balance, and parity, and fairness. In this case, unfortunately for him, the tighty righty case is a Rube Goldberg contraption of half-truth and innuendo trying to mask what is nothing more than a baldly cynical attempt to hold onto waning political power. You don’t buy it, I don’t buy it, and frankly, I don’t think he does either. Boy has his faults, and its a long list, but “stupid” isn’t on it.
So, yeah, you hurt his feelings, you’re supposed to give his views equal attention and respect, even if they don’t deserve it. Which is why he’s reduced to channeling Starving Artist’s “Winning! Winning! Winning!” pathology fugue state.
He’ll get over it.
All you have to do is listen, Bricker. And I listened to you for a long time, because I thought you might have something worthwhile to say.
I’m looking for the Sane Conservative. Instead I find blubbering walruses like you who declare victory while standing in ash.
When are you two lovebirds going to knife and make up?
He keeps trying to stab me, but his ideological strabismus makes him hit the wall to my right.
I’ve just moved next to a junction box, hoping to fix the problem once and for all. 
That’s a really useful tactic.
Yes, i remember that post – it was just before the post where you broke down and admitted fabricating other people’s admissions.
There’s no pretending: the benefits DO in fact outweigh any negatives.
You lose at the legislature, you lose at the courts, you lose in the court of public opinion – about all you have left is this tactic: standing here bravely, with lower lip trembling, a voice choked with emotion as you claim to represent the real spirit of the land - a spirit that only you and you fellow leftys are truly able to perceive.
Well, tremble away. And let that tear go ahead and drop; the flowers can use the water.
Oh, I’m sorry, I took your stopping debate and gloating that you won based on the legal realities (haw haw haw) as admission that you couldn’t argue for your side based on rational and intelligent arguments.
Please, do go on.
Can’t we all just get along? No? Well, OK, then, let 'er rip!
(See that, Jesus? Trying to be a peacemaker, right there! Gotta count for something, right? Say, take the ten worst puns off my Permanent Record? OK, five? Lord?..)
Which reminds me, forgot to congratulate President McCain. Oh, wait…