Great, now I feel like a jerk with OCD. Really, I don’t have to solve clues in any particular order, but I do tend to start with 1 Across, and it’s nice to at least have a fighting chance of getting a foothold. Sorry about omitting the letter count though.
Hmm, I wouldn’t have been so vulgar if I’d known this would end up in the game room.
If the the clue had been, it keeps … maybe I would have made the leap. As it was, I was figuring it would be some sort of timekeeper for a race or something. Sure, timekeeper doesn’t fit, but the theme included leaving out letters so who knows? Or it could have been timer.
I do the crosswords online through an iPad app. This was the Sunday, May 1 puzzle.
That’s what I thought, too, until I realised that maybe the OP intended “One” to refer to the clue number? So it would have been less-ambiguously rendered as “1. Keeping a watch on someone?”.
Why is the question mark a dead giveaway? And yes, “one” in this case implies the answer is a person. I don’t like the clue, either, although I would not have pitted it.
There is nothing wrong with that. Years ago I used to catch the train home and every day sat with the same guy. We would take turns solving clues in the crossword, ideally going through them in order, handing the paper and pen back and forth. The non-solving dude was free to read his book while the solving dude found the first solvable clue. Randomly jumping about looking for solutions was verboten. There is a reason that things are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 etc
The “one” is perfectly fair, too. If I own a watch strap, I have one. I need one to to keep a watch on me.
The point of the NYT puzzle is that the words can have two meanings. It just short of a cryptic crossword (the most challenging of them all), where such things happen in just about every definition. The standard one-to-one definitions in most US crosswords are the main reason I don’t bother with them.