I Pit Where Liberalism Has Gone

Except that there was no heavy bet on identity politics and left wing social stances.

Sure must’ve burned you that we had a BLACK president.

Obama’s approval is very high. You’re “trashed” because you’ve said hateful and bigoted (and false) things, as well as incredibly stupid false things. If you don’t want to be trashed, stop saying hateful and bigoted things, and stop saying stupid and fact-free nonsense.

yep, every man a raciss’.

Actually, I’m not the only one to make the observation I did.

[QUOTE=iiandyiiii]
Obama’s approval is very high. You’re “trashed” because you’ve said hateful and bigoted (and false) things, as well as incredibly stupid false things.
[/QUOTE]

His job approvals are high because he’s not up for election, so he’s seen as more “above the fray,” and because both HRC and DJT have poor favorability ratings.

Yes, Obama alienated the country so horrifically that he currently has a 54% approval rating. Which incidentally is about 4 points higher than it was at this time in 2012, where he beat Romney by 332 electoral votes to 206.

Obama alienated the country so totally that if he were running today against Trump, B. Hussein Obama would win in one of the biggest landslides in memory. B. Hussein would be wiping the floor with that deceased orange marmoset that Trump wears on top of his head.

You really are a priceless fuckwit.

Then why did you say he’s alienated the country? He obviously hasn’t, considering his high approval. Why throw out obviously false things like this? It’s so easy to avoid.

Every man who insists on using Obama’s middle name for no discernible reason, and who also unapologetically says hateful and bigoted things… yes.

he’s made enough of the country potentially put Trump in the White House.

Obama’s effect isn’t too different than Bill Clinton’s in 2000 in the wake of the Lewinsky scandal. I do think it hurt Gore pretty hard, but I also believe Gore hurt Gore as badly as Lewinsky did. Gore thought he’d win a state any idiot could be known would be rigged against him, FL, with his opponent’s brother in charge there. Gore got 267 EVs (before the faithless elector brought his official tally to 266 EVs) so any single state would’ve put him over the top because all states and DC have >3 EVs. Hillary has not made huge tactical mistakes that Gore made; that’s why I hold Obama far more accountable than I do Bill in 2000.

Not according to the polling aggregates. The most conservative, 538, still has Hillary as a 2-1 favorite, and most of the others have her closer to 10-1 or higher.

So if Hillary wins big, you’ll change your mind and believe that Obama did a great job?

Yeah, use stereotypical black dialect to show you aren’t a racist. Good call.

Serious question: why is it, do you think, that the Democratic coalition contains so many more racial minorities than the Republican coalition?

Kraushaar has a political prognosis record that is pathetically poor. He tends to get his facts wrong and his conclusions rarely make sense.

That someone (with no particularly good credentials) happens to have bought into the Right wing talking point hardly provides support for your position. If I quoted a Creationist talking against Evolution, would that be evidence that Evolutionary Theory is wrong? No, it would just mean that one can find odd beliefs held by odd people in a lot of places.

oh, and the SPLC putting Ayaan Hirsi Ali on its hate list is yet ANOTHER great example of the decay of liberalism.

Not a lot of bad things being said about muslims in the Maldives or Mauritania, both 100% muslim countries. Most of the “bad things” being said about muslims are being said about muslims from a particular part of the world.

I think that campus liberalism has always been with us.

Before I came to this board, I thought I was a pretty liberal guy. Then I ran into the stupid shit you reference being spouted by seemingly intelligent people. That’s when I realized that a lot of liberals aren’t smart, they just parrot liberal ideas which in general are smart and in an effort to remain “smart” they continue to parrot liberal ideas regardless of whether or not they make any sense. Their failure to have reached these conclusions through critical thought leads them to try and bully others to believe what they believe and this has led to liberal thought policing. Like you said, we must now believe things like “women make 78% of what men make (all other things being equal)”

So I took a walk on the other side and I think I prefer our stupid retarded assholes to their stupid retarded assholes.

As in fact this did not happen, but is simply the parroting of a distortion…

You might be liberal on some issues, but you’re also an unrepentant and delusional bigot, and most liberals don’t want to be allies with an unrepentant and delusional bigot like you. What “critical thought” leads you to see trans people as “repulsive” and “disgusting” (your words)? What critical thought leads you to slander in the most cowardly way patriotic American Muslims like Khizr Khan and his family? What critical thought leads you to assert fact-free bullshit about President Obama’s beliefs?

However you got to your beliefs, it wasn’t through critical thinking.

Have you confused Damuri with Derek, or is Damuri a significantly worse person than I’d realized?

Oh wow, that was incredibly dumb of me. I’m very, very sorry Damuri – For some reason I must have seen the D and thought it was Derek. I disagree with a lot of what you post but I’ve never seen anything bigoted from you, and I greatly apologize for confusing you with someone else.

:smack: Wow what an idiotic mistake. Apologies.

I’m not going to read 8 pages to find out if this has been said already.

You’re right. The problem with the left is that we have won all of the important fights and now we are fighting over scraps and bragging rights. You don’t see right-wingers bagging on each other for not being right-wing enough. They unite.

We divide.

We divide because we have set a ridiculous ideal and we expect our allies to adhere to them. Any indication that you don’t agree 100% with the orthodoxy means you aren’t worthy. We are a self-righteous and entirely insecure group of people.

I’ll use me as an example - 'cause I’m a monkey.

I absolutely believe that my country has fucked over natives left, right and center. I absolutely believe that the vast majority of their problems are a result of systemically imposed oppression. I certainly don’t believe that natives are genetically predisposed to violence.

But if I’m out at night and I see a group of natives coming toward me I’m much more on guard than I am if it is a group of whites. This isn’t because natives are inherently worse than whites but because when random violence happens in my city it is generally natives that do it.

All of the historicity does not change the fact that if you are out and downtown and get jumped it is more likely to be natives than white people.

Expressing this opinion makes me a racist.

I’m most certainly not racist. I don’t believe that their problems are because their race is problematic. I believe that their problems are result of enforced poverty and hopelessness. Give a native the same opportunities as a white person and they will have pretty much the same outcome.

Ideology should not trump reality. The real truth is that if I’m to be the victim of random crime the perpetrator is more likely to be native. Refusal to accept a fact does not negate the fact. But screaming “racist” is the quickest and easiest way to demonstrate your progressiveness without actually doing anything.

We are most smugly self-congratulatory people there are.

So while the right-wing bands together in spite of differences of opinion on nuances we eviscerate each other over them.

That, combined with the immediate convenience of myopia, is the reason that we are losing.

Until such a time as we are prepared to accept that our allies might not agree with us absolutely we will continue to lose and bemoan our self-imposed fate.

John fucking Mace yet again.

Here is a NOT SAFE FOR WORK bit from Chris Rock and one more

Would anything he said be more or less true if he wasn’t black? Would it be more or less offensive if he was white?

The tail-end of the first bit comes at the end of the stand-up CD it’s on. A black guy comes up to Chris Rock and says how much he loves black people but hates niggers and no problem. Then a Latina comes up and says the same thing. No problem.

Then a white guy comes up and says the same thing - cue sounds of white guy getting his ass kicked.

Chris Rock is acknowledging and mocking the notion that truth spoken is truth regardless of the colour of the mouth it comes out of.

I picked race because it is the easiest to illustrate but the same standard holds true for pretty much every aspect of left-wing ideology.

More fantasy versions of the left, Zeke N. Destroi. Maybe a very small portion of liberals are a bit nutty, but not the majority. Citing statistics isn’t racist.

Defend an unrepentant bigot like DerekMichaels00 if you like, but he has openly stated he feels that trans people are “repulsive” and “disgusting” and lied and made false statements about people from Khizr Khan to Barack Obama (who usually just so happen to be brown or black), among many other incredibly stupid posts.