Dear troll:
By stating the 100% accurate truth and pointing out how you were forced to continually move the goalposts as each one of your rationalizations was shot down?
Yah, my bad. :rolleyes:
Yes, showing your profound, willful ignorance of the mechanics and nature of various firearms. And arguing that since they weren’t necessary (in your ignorance-based view), people should not have them. Of course, you’ve also remained deliberately ignorant of why you’d use various firearms for various purposes (your claim that a handgun could replace a hunting rifle is priceless), or for that matter, why a flash suppressor, muzzle shrouds, etc… need to be banned. Generally when someone tries to pin you down on that point, you shift the goalposts again and complain about how it’s simply unreasonable for someone to ask that you know wtf you’re talking about before you attempt to violate the Bill of Rights.
You obviously have no clue as to what intellectual honesty means. Here’s a hint, it doesn’t mean “pointing out that your original ignorance-based rationalization was crap, and you shifted the goalposts as soon as you were caught at it.” Complaining about how you are being held to your own words though, you whiny bitch?
Yah, that might do it.
Yes, if you’re a moron.
That means: go ahead spunky.
Of course, were you not a deliberately ignorant trolling asshole, you might even recognize that one can add different arguments without abandoning the first. While you, on the other hand, abandoned your first and added additional rationalizations, without ever conceding that you were wrong.
No, you lying schmuck.
When you, like the gleefully stupid troll you are, pointed out that you were supporting a bill without even having read it, many of us responded by pointing out that since the bill itself was created by people who were ignorant or lying on the subject of the bill, there was no reason to place blind faith in them. I know you’re also painfully stupid, but try real hard to figure out why " ‘Assault weapon’ is a meaningless scare phrase… and the people who are using it are wrong to do so" is not shifting the goalposts but “People should not have ‘assault weapons’ because they’re not necessary. Er, I mean, they’re too dangerous. Er, I mean, they’re too dangerous and their functions can be replaced by any other gun. Er, I mean, they have no uses. Er…” is shifting the goalposts.
True, especially since you’re lying through your rotten little troll teeth in order to pretend that I did any such thing, you stupid son of a bitch. What did I, in fact, say, you liar? Ya know, in the post you quoted and responded to, idiot?
What did I say before that?
You stupid liar, why lie about me when all I have to do is quote my own posts? Obviously, I made quite clear that I was taking you to task for your stupidity in your original argument, and how you had changed it. Are you really so fucking stupid that you think that my specific claim of you shifting the goalposts meant you never changed your tune? Are you really that much of a fool? That when I delineate between your original argument and the rationalizations that you added in later when you shifted the goalposts, that I’m claiming your argument remained exactly as it was at first?
I don’t believe it. You’re stupid, but you’re not that stupid.
Just a troll.