I’ve been solving cryptic crosswords my whole adult life. American ones, e.g. the ones made by Cox and Rathvon. Generally I can do them without too much difficulty.
For the last year or so I’ve been working on British puzzles from the London Times. They are far more difficult. They use a lot of obscure words, a lot of obscure meanings of common words, and worst of all a lot of Britishisms I have no clue about. So I’m happy when I can even figure out half the clues.
But yesterday, for the first time ever, I solved a complete puzzle! Allow me to gloat satisfactorily.
Congrats! I don’t think I’ve ever solved more than one clue. My brain just doesn’t seem to work that way. I know, practice, practice, practice. It’s still beyond my ken. Well done!
I find cryptics depend a lot on the author. I actually find the English ones more consistent with my way of thinking. The Globe and Mail guy loves anagrams but does not really use the full palette of options.
I just saw this, and a big congratulations! They are incredibly hard, especially with all those Britishisms.
I do have a strong fondness for those. In the 90s, I bonded with a best friend’s parents over many things, including cryptic crosswords. They bought me a book of London Times puzzles, and I keep them in the bedside drawer, and in the last 30 years I’ve completed exactly four of them. Those parents have since passed away, but every time I solve one I sent a note to my friend and let her know I’m thinking of them.