[QUOTE=smiling bandit]
Yes, you get the booby prize. The point of scripts is not to do anything useful. It lets managers measure things easily (kept to the script 8 of 10 times, etc.), lets them hire cheaper labor that knows nothing, and generally make time whiel postphoning the issue in the hope that it resolves itself or the customer goes away. The goal of most commercial tech support (that is, not in-house support) is to screw the customer over just enough that they hate you and never use the tech support again but not enough to drop your product.
[/QUOTE]
Actually, no. The industry really believes that scripting works. Believe me, I’ve been in management in a huge corporate call center. “First call resolution” is a HUGE deal because otherwise, people tend to call back over and over, which costs money.
The problem with scripting is it creates the notion that that’s all there is to the job. My old company (an outsourcer) would basically tell clients that we could take in any literate person off the street with no computer experience and turn them into a tech. This is a very, very attractive notion. Not true, but attractive.
The problem is that scripts don’t always work and technology tends to change faster than the scripts. Plus, you end up with problems like the person calling up on a less common operating system, or what have you.
Most people don’t try the easy stuff (like restarting the computer) so there’s a place for scripts. Places that make it required simply don’t trust their employees. I can’t totally disagree with that. You hire anybody to be a tech, you can’t really trust their judgement.
In the end though you get a lot of frustration when a situation is slightly different. The technical person will go “hmm, that sounds a lot like X. Let’s try this” whereas a non-technical person will freeze up and either give a wrong answer or need to go get help, taking a long time.
Believe me, those companies WANT to resolve your problems. The problem is they want to do it for absolute bottom dollar and if they manage to resolve 60-80% of cases on the first try - not unreasonable with scripting and given that most people don’t do any type of troubleshooting on their own - they count it as a success. Granted 20-40% of customers will be really frustrated and may not be able to get help, but does that mean they want to pay for a real tech, 2-3 times as much money and you have to treat them better?
This is how we end up at the ‘tier’ structure. The schlubs making barely over minimum wage are the ones helping people restart their computers and baby-stepping them through opening the Control Panel. The real techs get the real problems.
What I find really frustrating are companies that don’t have tiers - you just end up with the lowest level and can’t get a higher level tech even if they can’t fix it. Or, their second tier won’t talk to customers directly, so you end up having to use this non-technical person as an intermediary to rattle off information in a bizarre game of “Telephone”.