Women aren’t people. They’be be contented happy sheep as God intended, except for the dirty sinners putting evil wicked sinful ideas in their otherwise empty heads. Stone them!
Stone the idea-sharers, that is. Keep the women because we’ll need them to keep having babies and stuff, as long as nobody gives them any ideas.
Which has nothing to do with my point. It matters because if she requested the death penalty that probably means she waived the requisite number of appeals. Certainly if she lived in a state with no death penalty she wouldn’t have gotten it regardless, but even living in a state with the death penalty there is a lot of hoops you have to jump through before you can be executed…unless you waive them of course.
Regardless, there is pretty much zero chance that, even if scary liberal nightmare America happens down the road, a woman getting an abortion would ever be given a death sentence. Zero chance. Trotting out a one off and bizarre example of a women executed for killing her young children and wanting the death penalty doesn’t change that, and really only poisons the well for a real discussion. Like I said…keep it real if you want to have a real discussion. YMMV of course.
If human life begins at conception, then getting an abortion should carry the same penalty as murdering your infant child – either a long prison sentence or possibly execution. It’s hard to see how the pro-life position admits any other possibility.
Depends on the stage of abortion. I think doctors who commit abortions pre-viability should have their licenses suspended or other punishments of those nature, while those who commit abortion after viability should be treated like any other murderer.
We’re not asking about doctors. Since there are not roving bands of abortionists holding pregnant women down and aborting their fetuses against their wishes, there is a woman involved who has allowed the procedure to occur.
Or, in a world where doctors who perform illegal abortions are treated as you suggest, there will be far less of them to do the procedure, women will simply take matters into their own hands, as Dr. Waldo Fielding, a retired gynecologist, wrote in the New York Times in 2008:
So what are we charging these women for, the ones with bloody coat hangers still stuck inside of them, the ones who did this to themselves.
Should have read the OP more thoroughly. I think in general, pre-viability mothers should not be punished for abortions but those who do post-viability should be treated the same as those who commit infanticide.
While I don’t wish to discount the obvious dangers of abortions not by qualified physicians which in a consistent pro-life society should be prevented by universal access to contraception, sex education, and full support for both the mother and child, “coathanger” abortions it seems to me is in many ways the pro-choice equivalent of pro-life activists holding up signs and pictures of aborted fetuses-one that is a very strong emotional argument. The evidence as documented by the Straight Dope (http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2510/before-em-roe-em-v-em-wade-em-did-10-000-women-a-year-die-from-illegal-abortions), indicates that the number of women who died from illegal abortions pre-Roe was extremely small (many if not most may very well have died even if abortion was legal) and this was over forty years ago before even further modern advances in medical technology.
I think if its an actual condition where the baby will not live long after birth (not say something like Down’s Syndrome) and be largely in pain, it is at the very least a mitigating factor that is not morally equivalent and something if it poses a risk to the mother in delivery where abortion is justified.