Four thousand dollars! You can give Ringo less if you want to.
Successful bands? No.
Furthermore, there have been plenty of examples of successful bands that went on hiatus, for a short or long time, so that their members could pursue other projects (solo work, other bands, spend time with family, get on or off drugs, pursue non-musical interests, etc.), but then got back together and made some more successful music. I think the Beatles, had they all lived long enough, could have done this too.
While I reserve a dose of skepticism, I think you may be underestimating the important of how the Beatles impacted each other as a group. Their solo careers became the fluff of four people with nothing to prove and nobody telling them no.
There’s a chance a record in 1980 would have been more bland fluff, but I think there’s at least an equal chance that they would have find a balance of collaboration and competition that would have brought out much stronger material from all of them than we otherwise got.
I think there is no need to imagine [del] if there is no heaven [/del]…
Paul McCartney & Michael Jackson - Say Say Say (Official Music Video HD)
A Beatles session would filter out the songs that are weak, indulgent, vapid or schmaltzy (to a large extent)
In 1979/80 McCartney was pretty strong if you cherry pick: for example “Coming Up”, “Getting Closer”, “Arrow Through Me”.
Double Fantasy had several good songs.
For Harrison, “Blow Away”, “All Those Years Ago”
I would expect a pretty good album, say, better than Let It Be but down a step or two from Abbey Road.
“Froth-funk”???
I dunno. Seems to me John and Ringo had better collaborations with Eric Clapton and Klaus Voorman from '68 onward than they had with each other or with the other Beatles. I may be underestimating their synergy towards the end, but they were able to fnd other, equally distinguished work partners with very little effort.
Double Fantasy released about 6 weeks before Lennon was murdered, and sales and reviews were pretty tepid before the tragedy. The best songs, “(Just Like) Starting Over” and “Jealous Guy,” were far from peak Lennon. And since the album was released on LP and cassette, it was physically difficult to skip Yoko’s tracks, which most people listened to under duress.
The OP posits a reality where John was never shot, which “All Those Years Ago” was recorded as a reaction to. It was a pretty tight song, though.
Double Fantasy had 50% Yoko songs, so it was doomed in terms of popular and critical reception. Hilights were (Just Like) Starting Over, Beautiful Boy, Woman. Jealous Guy was from 1971.
“All Those Years Ago” was written and originally recorded before the assassination and was re-written and re-recorded after it.
“Jealous Guy” was from his 1971 album Imagine. If it sounds like it came from Double Fantasy, maybe that means his style hadn’t changed that much.
The music for “Jealous Guy” was composed in 1968, and it could have appeared on The Beatles’ “White Album”, with different lyrics, as “Child of Nature”.
I absolutely do not for an instant think a 1980 Beatles album would have been better than Sgt. Pepper, Revolver, or Abbey Road. The odds against that would have been a million to one.
It would have been a great album to be sure. Consider, though, that just a year later, 1981 was the year the Rolling Stones, a band of essentially comparable vintage, with members the same age, put out “Tattoo You.” It’s a terrific album, but no one seriously argues it’s better than Sticky Fingers or Let It Bleed.
I would point out two critical things:
-
Almost all the best rock and pop artists of all time have had a peak that lasted five years or so, ten at the outside. They may last much longer, but almost never put out really innovative, great music all that long.
-
The Beatles were amazing in the 1960s because they were doing things no one else did. They did stuff BEFORE other bands did.
Consider, for instance, Supertramp, another British band. Supertramp made some great albums, and I’ll say this straight up; if you could use a time machine to take Supertramp back to 1966, and had them release “Breakfast in America” before Sgt. Pepper came out, in exactly the form it was actually released in 1979, today a lot of people would strenuously argue that “Breakfast in America” was the greatest album ever made. The reason they don’t today is because it wasn’t made in 1966; it was made in 1979, and while still a magnificent album, it is still standing on the shoulders of giants and wasn’t THAT innovative in the context of its time. Sgt. Pepper started progressive rock; Breakfast in America tidied it up into a perfect album, which is awesome, but it’s just not as impressive an accomplishment.
Anything the imaginary Beatles make in 1980 will be like that; the likelihood the boys could have continued to be that much more innovative in their 40s is just next to nothing. They made excellent music individually but their stuff in the late 70s is objectively not anywhere near the Beatles.
Given that’s around that period a lot of rock bands were trying disco albums because they figured that is how things are now, I really don’t think a Disco Beatles album is something I’d want to hear.
You know, the biggest knock against the Beatles has always been that you can’t dance to them…
Paul and Michael also collaborated on “The Girl Is Mine,” the first single from Thriller, which is a solid effort that I personally enjoy (as I do “Say Say Say”). It was written principally by Michael. And there was “This Is the Man” from Pipes of Peace, which is not good at all.
Nitpick - “Jealous Guy” wasn’t on Double Fantasy but was on Imagine. I agree with you on the Yoko tracks. Drove me batty having to listen to her screeching.
With “All Those Years Ago,” George had already written the music, but the lyrics were tailored to account for the shooting. You’re right – it’s a solid effort, and it included Paul and Ringo (and Linda and Denny Laine), giving us a taste of what may have been.
There is a fairly strong argument that “Double Fantasy” is the worst album to ever win the Grammy for Best Album. Remember, they gave that award to Celine Dion one year, so that’s saying a lot.
I assumed from the thread title that the OP was asking what would have happened if they recorded in 1980–if they also were born 20 years later than they were. [A much more interesting question IMHO] I can definitely see them being punkers at first, quickly transitioning to Echo & the Bunnymen style postpunk.
Not sure if I’m being whooshed here or something, but this must be really little-known ![]()
![]()