From what religious viewpoint are you asking?
[hijack, vaguely related to OP]
This one is for the Catholics. Say I’m a Catholic - baptized, confirmed, all of it. I’ve just committed a mortal sin, but I’m not repentent. However, I happen to be wearing a scapular (why? I don’t know. I just am.) I get hit by a car, and die without ever confessing my sin. Does the scapular send me to Heaven? Do I still have to go to Purgatory? Or do I go to Hell anyway?
[/end hijack]
Most Christian sects seem to subscribe to one of the following viewpoints on the afterlife:
- Most Protestants: Eternal punishment or eternal reward.
- Catholics: Temporary punishment followed by eternal reward, or eternal punishment, or eternal reward – though it’s probably more complicated than that, as everything Catholic is. =)
- Some liberal Protestants: Eternal reward only; hell is figurative.
- “Others”: Something else, like resurrection to paradise on earth, or eternal death, or ascension to heaven for a pre-chosen 144,000 (Jehovah’s Witnesses) or the very esoteric LDS afterlife system.
Some things to consider for those who believe in eternal Hell:
-
Most cultures believe that punishment should fit the crime. The Judeo-Christian God seems to support this; see Exodus 21:23-25, or Sections 196 and 200 of Hammurabi’s Code – “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. What offense could merit an eternity spent in horrible suffering? Does genocide? Murder? A single lie? Calling someone a fool (see Matthew 5:22, 23:17)?
-
If God is love (1 John 4:8, John 3:16, Romans 5:8), then why would he condemn people to eternal suffering, even for minor offenses? Suppose that it is granted that one cannot enter Heaven unless they are Christians (e.g. Matthew 18:3) or at least free of sin (e.g. Matthew 5:19). Why, then, must there be no other possibility but for those who do not meet those requirements to suffer infinitely?
-
Why is the Bible inconsistent on what warrants entry into Heaven and what warrants Hell? (There are examples of this throughout the New Testament, particularly in Matthew.)
-
The Bible is very sparse in its description of Hell. The word “hell” appears 54 times in the NIV, 15 of which are in the New Testament. The only real description of Hell is in Revelation, while the rest of the New Testament mostly describes activities that lead to or away from it. What is Hell like? Is it just a lake of fire, as described in Revelation 21:8? Or is it a more elaborate place of torture, such as was described in later, non-canonical Christian writings?
-
Could the fact that the description of Hell evolved greatly from the Gospels (“fire”, late 1st century) to Revelation (“lake of fire”, etc., circa AD 100) to Dante’s Inferno mean something? Did early Christians perhaps find that the threat of Hell was a useful conversion tool?
-
There are some people who have become Christians only because of the fear of Hell. Is there faith genuine? As an analogy, if someone is forced to convert to a religion by the threat of violence, as has happened countless times in history, are they a true adherent of that religion? What happens to, say, Christians who are forced to convert to another religion? Compare this with what happens to those who die for their faith. What happens to non-Christians who are forced to convert to Christianity? Are they saved? Compare this with what happens if they choose to die for their faith. What does this mean about dying for one’s beliefs?
Disregarding all the FLUFF™ on the topic such as what Catholics or various Protestant denominations have to say about it, according to the Bible, you would go to hell.
Why?
And, what is hell, exactly, “according to the Bible”?
If you read his text you will see kind of a brief summary of what he has done throughout his life. Nothing that he mentioned has anything to do with salvation and if you don’t actively participate in the whole salvation plan thing then you are going to hell by default. If you believe that, based on his post, that he would be going to heaven according to the Bible, then about 95% or more of the world’s population would be going to heaven if the only qualification to get in was living an okay life that didn’t involve doing anything too terrible combined with some occasional “nice” deeds. As it turns out, the Bible tells us that very few people are actually going to Heaven:
Now, how about people who have done many great works, and perhaps have even prophesied in Christ’s name? They would be a shoe-in for Heaven right?
The Bible endorsed method for getting to heaven is summed up pretty good with this quote attributed to Christ:
As far as what hell is “according to the Bible”, here is the most descriptive passage about hell in the Bible:
I find it incomprehensible that anyone could actually believe in, and worship, such a sadistic, depraved, and malevolent creator.
You have my sincerest sympathies.
Keep your emotions to yourself. You may note that any discussion of the Bible that I do is in an “according to the Bible” fashion. What it says as a whole can be debated, your emotions based on the text can not be debated, neither do I wish to try.
But, in the absence of logic and rational thinking (which is impossible in an “according to the Bible” discussion), what else do we have but emotion?
What difference does it make what piece of text is being discussed? Or what movie is being discussed for that matter? Whether you agree with the text or not, the fact that the interpretation of the text is crystal clear in certain aspects remains unchanged.