Being married to more than one person is bigamy and I don’t think that’s legal anywhere in the US. Homosexual marriage is about allowing two people of the same sex to get married, it doesn’t have anything to do with MORE than two people.
At the same time? As Valgard says, it’s bigamy. Assuming gay marriage is made legal, it’s a bigger stretch to ever think bigamy would made legal, especially under the circumstances you illustrate.
Cite? Perhaps we need some stats (if available) and see if this opinion has any basis in fact. You infer the poorer spouse always gets half the other’s assets.
WAG - It depends on the location where you get married and where you get divorced. Sounds to me you creating a sham marriage concept that any decent judge/lawyers would see through so fast the real result might be something else entirely.
Depends on the lifestyle you think you can sustain.
Yes but it’s still one marriage. The only thing that would change is whether you’d be able to marry one man or one woman. It’s like saying you get one ice cream cone, but you can choose whatever flavor of ice cream you like. More options, but still just one cone in the end.
Having a same-sex marriage does not put you on any sort of “registration for life” list. It’s not like declaring your political party affiliation
The movement to allow for same-sex marriages is intended to let any two people, straight or gay, to be married. And divorced. The aim is not to have separate rules for gays and straights, it’s to give them EQUAL rights.
So in a perfect world you can marry and scam anyone you like.