if only firefighters carried guns

I don’t know if that was directed at my post but if it was I never said anything like that.

I disagree. I think prohibition is a good comparison. Guns are way too important to criminals for the problem to just dry up. IMHO, of course.

Anyone who says “criminals will get their guns anyway so any attempts at gun control is pointless” are saying exactly that.

They were shot because there is a feminized, mamby-pamby culture of menstrual fail among first responders.

Why do we even bother fighting fires, anyway? Fires happen every day; it’s impossible to put them all out.

Do firefighters think that because they have put out a fire today, nobody will ever be able to start another fire? Even if a building can’t burn, it could be destroyed just as easily some other way, like by a tornado. Or do firefighters think they can stop tornadoes, too? Fighting fires will not solve the problem.

When fires are fought, only arsonists will have fire.

I’m guessing you need a hobby. Posting here all day long does not count.

Oh, hai - if only convicted murderers weren’t set free after 17 years, and oh by the way he can’t have legally owned those guns anyway.

See, thing is - this guy should have been executed years ago - or not let out of prison at all. But no, he got out, got guns, and decided to engage in murder again. But I’m certain he was completely mentally stable, and it was the soothing voices of the blue-steel beasties whispering to him at night that really made him do it.

So let’s jump on the “no moar gunz!!1111!” bandwagon again since it’s trendy to do so lately, but spend exactly zero words on the person who actually did the shooting.

Typical.

As people are so fond of pointing out, the U.S. is only about 5% of the world’s population or something like that - so I’d say if you’re so damn scared of all of these guns levitating around and shooting themselves at people, you go somewhere that already has taken care of the problem.

He’s still got his collection of Dexter memorabilia and fan fiction.

Yes, it’s old and worn-out. And it’s exactly the same. Most kids are great.

I think folks are more afraid of belligerent assholes like you having easy access to semi-autos with 30 round clips.

If I had either of those, you might have a point. Wait, no you wouldn’t. Still, awesome response to the topic and the details of the perp that I posted. Enlightenment, thy name is intarwebz.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/12/24/1375651/career-criminal-set-a-trap-for-murdered-firefights-say-police/

An update from your good friends at ThinkProgress… Not good news, I fear.

Longtime Criminal Set A Trap To Murder Firefighters, Say Police

If I had said that you might have a point. But I didn’t and so you don’t.

I’m not the one who keeps making things up. You can go fuck a cactus for all I care. Merry Christmas!

Yeah, you pussies: if you don’t like preposterously lax gun laws, move to another country! Sane people know those are the only possible options!

The laws are not preposterously lax, but they only apply to people who abide by them.

Let’s see - guy who ambushed the firefighters? Felon, not allowed to own a firearm. Also a murderer.

Kid who shot up the school? Killed his mother and took her legally owned guns (or in other words, stole them - after murdering his mother).

Guy at the mall in Oregon? Stolen gun from a friend.

These are just the most recent examples - no doubt you can come up with some that used legally purchased guns (like the Colorado lunatic, for example). Pray, tell me what laws you would see enacted that WOULD have stopped those shootings?

Is it your contention that the US has more mentally ill people than all the other countries in the world, and that’s why they have less gun violence? Or are you possibly bemoaning the fact that the US has poorer healthcare options for mentally ill people than other civilized countries?

Yes, we know the NRA fake-anarchist song and dance: some people won’t follow the laws, so don’t even bother trying to come up with any.

Worse, they seem to think it is actually traditional.

But, you do. Access, that is.

Yup. Democrats, take note. It’s the only answer. You have to. It’s your duty, really, when you think about it.