If you are a Republican, you are a racist -- or might as well be

Over the last 40 years, the Republican Party has deliberately engaged in a campaign of appealing to the ugliest elements of the American South in an attempt to win votes – the Southern Strategy developed by Original Scumbag himself, Richard Nixon. Basically the idea was that with the Democrats supporting the Civil Rights movement and thereby gaining black votes, the Republicans could get more votes by appealing to racism and bigotry.

Here’s a link describing the Southern Strategy in more detail

There is no doubt that this strategy has succeeded – Democratic presidential candidates have won very few states in the South over the last 40 years.

The Republican politicians working post-civil rights have been canny in never openly voicing their racist appeals in the language of racism – “Do you want them niggers dating your sister?” – instead they used code words to describe their inveterate opposition to racial equality.

When the issue was ending segregation and Jim Crow laws, the Republican tack was never to openly advocate (in the language of the time) “keeping the Negro in his place.” They instead advocated “state’s rights” i.e., the rights of states to have Jim Crow laws.

When the issue was affirmative action, the code word became “quotas” and “reverse racism” the idea being that innocent white kids were being kept out of advanced education by “quotas” established to ensure that some black kids got a college education. And it’s true in the sense that if you admit a black kid to a particular institution, he or she takes the place of a white kid who might otherwise be eligible. But this kind of thinking constitutes “fairness” (another code word) only when you turn a completely blind eye to the huge disparities in numbers between the proportion of white kids going to college vs. black kids.

Always, always coincidentally we were given to understand, the Republicans have opposed any legislation that might benefit black people, always for reasons that they claimed had nothing to do with an appeal to racism.

Here’s a link with more on code words

Many Republicans will accept the notion that their leadership has historically embraced racism, but will say, “I’m not a racist, I deplore that aspect of my party’s behavior and am working (usually in some unsubstantiated way) to change it. I like other aspects of the Republican platform.”

Even granting that this is true, the fact remains that by continuing to vote for, work for and generally support a party that promotes racism, you yourself are promoting racism. Yes, you are holding your nose while you do it, but it’s your dollar that supports the election campaigns, your muscle that gets the mailers carried out the door, your vote that gets the candidate elected – the candidate who will vote along party lines and continue the covert support of racism.

Oh, maybe you like black people, maybe you ARE black people, but considering the effect your actions as a Republican are having in the world, you might as well have a fucking hood on your head and wear a robe stamped “KKK.”

Good thing I’m not a Republican then.

By the way, have you stopped beating your wife?

Yes. I mean, no. I mean … come back when you have an actual argument.

If only that advice was followed before you posted this humorous and ignorant rant!

I have yet to see one from you.

You post about a “Southern Strategy” and “code words” and then you make the blanket declaration that all Republicans are racist. That’s a terrific argument. Hey, the only two Presidents in history that were impeached were Democrats. Therefore all Democrats are amoral and corrupt. Same sort of argument, and just as stupid.

Sorry. Even granting that Nixon’s strategy was racist (and I would consider that of Reagan’s handlers, as well), the actual discussions and viewpoints regarding affirmative action, set asides, open housing, right to work, and a host of other issues that touch on race are not nearly so cut and dried as you would like to portray them. If Republicans are “racists–or might as well be,” then Democrats are “soft on Communism/terrorism/crime/etc.” (I find both charges silly.) In a country dominated by a two-party system, one’s options are to choose one of the two parties that is more likely to support the larger number of one’s positions or to support a party that has no chance of actively participating at the presidential, congressional, gubernatorial, or legislative level. Branding everyone from either of the major parties with a (fallacious) label is no different than the “code words” that you called out in the OP.

Even on those issues regarding race where I would side with Democrats, I can generally see the legitimacy of specific points raised by Republicans regarding those issues. Laying down a blankewt condemnation does nothing to further the discussion or to reach the optimum decision on any issue.

My father, who is a conservative/republican and also of hispanic/indian decent would be facinated to know that he is a racist…and that all republicans are racists too. In other news, did you know all hispanics are theves and lazy to boot? :rolleyes:

Doesn’t this kind of shit belong in the pit??

-XT

Evil Captor, what point would you have us argue, exactly? You’ve made a unilateral assertion. You have neither asked nor implied any sort of question that would garner any sort of debate. If your argument had been expressed in something of a less extreme fashion, you might have found people willing to engage you in a fascinating discussion.

Instead… well, dog pile on you is the name of the game. Have fun.

That’s it. No way am I voting for Nixon this year.

Democrats were the anti-slavery party in the Civil War. Obviously, they’re all now pro-slavery.

Wouldn’t this OP fit better in the Pit?

My father came here from El Salvador with absolutely nothing.

As a Latin, he was certainly part of a racial minority, as, I suppose, am I, although I was born here and grew up here in the US.

My support for the Republican party is not in the least grounded in any appeal that racism might hold. I believe there are absolutely legitimate arguments to be made against affirmative action, and when I applied to college, I deliberately identified as caucasian as opposed to Hispanic, because the thought of receiving preferential treatment based on my ancestry was abhorrent to me. I should point out that we were in no wise wealthy; my college attendance was possible only by working on campus in a sub-minimum wage job cleaning the deep-fat fryers every morning. And yet, somehow, my downtrodden economic status and ancestry still leaves me generally a Republican supporter today.

How that that fit in with your theory?

  • Rick

Using the logic of the OP, the statement, “Evil Captor is prejudiced against Republicans.” is equally valid.

I am disturbed by the inability of many posters (here’s looking at you Evil Captor) to assign anything but the basest of motives to their political opponents. The title alone of your post shows a frighteningly immature understanding of our political system. You may be aware that we have only two parties here. Being a Republican is hardly akin to supporting Le Pen, or Zhirinovskhy.

While I believe that you are correct in the essentially racist nature of the Southern strategy, it takes real chutzpah to slur roughly fifty percent of the electorate by association. Racist is one of the few things that no half civilized person wants to be called. You are using it as weapon, and as a bully. Do you believe that the Democratic party has no racists in its closet. Would it be reasonable to assign blame for the Tawanna Brawley affair to all Democrats?

I know this is going to be a shock to our more extreme posters, but I actually believe that there are good honest people from both parties. I believe that blind partisanship displays a lack of critical thinking, and that posts like yours start down the path of extremism. It is a shame that you only see black and white. I usually vote for a Democrat, but on occassion I am happy to vote for a good Republican candidate. If that makes me a racist then so be it.

All Republicans are poopy pants!

How I love this argument. Haven’t heard it in a while.

Burn the witch!
Anyway, my father, who was otherwise a good and decent, if somewhat shallow man, voted straight Republican most of his life and also was known on occasion to voice some racist sentiments, mostly through pure ignorance of anything outside his own experience. To go from that to “all Republicans are racists”, well, seems a bit over the top to me.

As others have mentioned, there are only two viable political parties at the national level. Aligning with either of them is, for most people I think, a compromise. Certainly in my case, while I have registered as a Democrat, I don’t necessarily agree with every single thing on their platform. I just agree more with that than the Republican platform, and find that most of the lesser parties are too single-issue to take seriously.

I sometimes wonder if partisan cheerleaders like the OP, or, say, Brutus, actually wish for a one-party state, and if so, why they think that such a state would better serve the peoples’ interests than what we have now. Maybe a subject for another thread.

IF I had to hazard a guess I would suspect that Evil Captor and his ilk wish national politics were like San Francisco politics. We would have a choice between liberal Democrats and the Green party. I don’t dare to imagine Brutus’ utopia.

An excellent question, El Kabong. Perhaps an interesting related question would be, what’s the difference between what we have now and a one-party system? Hmmm…

Arrrrrgh! The “ilk” are back! Head for the hills!

As someone who generally votes Democratic (and hardly ever Republican), I have to say that the case outlined in the OP will make a wonderful strategy for winning back the South for the Democratic Party.

“Vote for our candidate or you’re a bunch of racists!”
Shame 'em. That’ll work.

If “quotas” is a code word, tell us what the code word is for quota and we can use that instead. Are you denying that affirmative action discriminates against white students? Is it rascist to not want to be discriminated against?
Poor education is one of the most important issues facing minorities today, which party is it that fights tooth and nail against change in the status quo?
Social security pays a negative rate of return for black people, which party is it that fights allowing people to own their social security?
Minorities are much more likely to be victims of crimes than white people, which party is it that appoints criminal coddling judges?
I could go on, but saying that Republicans try to block any legislation that could help black people is a slanderous lie.
If you care about the fate of minorities in this country, vote Republican.