If you could add a rule to a sport . . what would it be?

Astorian - You have a point, but I really don’t think that it’s that big a deal. If your team commits a penalty, you cannot benefit from the play. That’s just the way it is in the NFL. The fact that the other team was also penalized is immaterial. Unless the penalties are radically different, say, a 5-yarder and a personal foul (and there are rules to cover that), offsetting penalties is appropriate.

Everyone - I don’t claim to be a soccer purist. Heck, even when I was playing it, I wasn’t a purist. I do know that there are certainly things about it that can be improved and, even if I’m not completely on the mark, please, just read and consider.

IMHO the most important thing is to punish diving and fake injuries, which often lead to unfair cards or even ejections against the opposing team, which I find absolutely reprehensible. You say you want the refs to crack down on it more? Fine, a red card should suffice. I think they’ll get the message pretty quickly (and if they don’t, their coaches certainly will). As for long-ball goal hanging if offsides is repealed…hey, you want to score tons of goals at the cost of leaving your own net wide open, be my guest. I’m pretty sure that even the dimmest team would eventually see the folly of this strategy. If there should be any rule against a striker’s advance, it should be encroachment (i.e. cannot go into a certain part of the field without the ball unless a defender’s there), which is fairer and also easier to enforce.

And okay, maybe penalty kicks for yellows is a bit harsh, but it should definitely be more than just a free kick…say, a corner kick. That’s certainly workable, and corner kicks don’t always result in goals anyway.

And now, come to think of it, I have some baseball suggestions as well:

  • Institute a pitch clock. Once the batter reaches the plate, the pitcher has a certain amount of time to get the ball over the plate; otherwise it’s a balk. Make it a nice, long time, say, 60 seconds, so the pitcher has time for a bunch of pickoff attempts before succumbing to the inevitable. “But Darrell, once the clock runs down the baserunner can steal with impunity because the pitcher can do any more pickoffs”…well then, don’t let the clock run all the way down. Seriously, what to incredibly protracted pickoff wars and eternities between actual pitches add to the game?
  • By the same token, give the batter a limited amount of time to get up to bat, and once he’s in the batter’s box, if he leaves it for any reason he’s out. And yes, hogging the plate so closely his feet are over the line counts as leaving the box.
  • The only thing more tiresome than an incredibly long pickoff war is an incredibly long foul ball war. How about this: If a batter fouls with a count of two strikes, he must bunt the next pitch. (If the bunt also goes foul, of course, then he’s out.) Too strict? All right, all right, four foul balls with a two-strike count. Whatever. Break up the stalemates, plus batters have to learn how to bunt again. What’s not to like?
    1. DH mandated for both leagues 2. but cannot earn more than 2x the the league minimum. Both sides go home happy!

All right, now, you can inundate me with extremely virulent posts abot how the pure purity of the game must be preserved at all costs and slow play is always a good thing and I’m just a worthless Dreamcast addict who can’t see the necessity of pickoff wars and etc. etc. :stuck_out_tongue:

Football: In the event of going into Overtime, the game may NOT be won by a FieldGoal. Only a Touchdown should decide a game in Overtime.

See I disagree with this. Another rule I would add to hockey is that the LOSER of the fight sits out the penalty, NOT the winner! (ref judges, in case of a draw, both sit for 2 1/2 minutes instead of 5!)

Any sport:
You are never allowed, in post-game interviews, to claim that you or your team gave “110%”. In fact, get rid of the post-game interviews altogether. We just saw the game; we don’t need the (even more) dumbed-down version of events that athletes and coaches invariably provide.

Not to hog my own thread, but one more football rule:

When you catch a pass, and hit the ground, and lose the ball, whether or NOT you had control of the ball, it is a FUMB-EL!!! I’m so sick of the wimpy NFL letting receivers get away with not controlling the football and then making it an “incomplete pass” and ruling the ball dead.

Also, I LOOOOVE the 2 puck rule. Maybe that can be worked into overtime if no one scores after 5 minutes. Then, add a puck every five minutes.

By the by, soccer fans, I remember a GREAT tiebreaker suggestion on this board a year ago. Make all overtimes in soccer Golden Goal (Sudden Death), and every 5 minutes, each team removes one player off the field!

Also, no more creditng God with your victory. As if the Almighty was blowing off the needs of all those Kosovar refugees to make sure the other team did not win.

Removing the two line pass rule would bring back the hockey of old where breakaways were much more common. The teams that now use the neutral zone trap and bore the shit out of me would become a thing of the past. If you think the game is fast now…

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Vinnie Virginslayer *
**
[QUOTE

Also, no more creditng God with your victory. As if the Almighty was blowing off the needs of all those Kosovar refugees to make sure the other team did not win. **[/QUOTE]

AQctually, I was thinking of this before I posted, but forgot to mention it. Good call.

Of course, the athletes who have an individualistic streak in them will get kooky and go with a different number like “120%” or “150%.”

You must have more faith in referees than I do. But then I am a Celtic supporter.

The point is that you wouldn’t need to leave your net wide open. Most strikers don’t do a lot of defending anyway, so a team wouldn’t be risking much by just parking them in front of their opponents’ goal for the full ninety.

ruadh claimed:

Now, you must know that a 50-50 call has never gone Aberdeen FC’s way. EVER!!! :slight_smile:

Cricket: If the batsman is struck on the pads and isn’t playing a shot, he ought to be out LBW if there is any suggestion that the ball would be otherwise hitting the stumps. The bowler should always get the benefit of the doubt under this circumstance. Yes, I am a spin bowler–why do you ask?

Baseball: NO GLOVES! (Er, except for the catcher.)

American Football: Any player who celebrates a play other than a touchdown (a sack, a first down, a tackle, for Pete’s sake) by dancing, shaking one or more limbs, or trash-talking gets an automatic trade to the XFL, where he will receive the XFL minimum wage.

Rugby (international matches only): At the start of the match, for every “foreign-born” player in your side, your opponents can claim two points. Wales can’t be allowed to play New Zealanders just because their great-grandmother’s second cousin twice removed was born in Swansea.

Sumo-wrestling: Ah, just replace it with donut-eating contests. It’s what the people want to see.

OK, fine. But let’s apply this rule to football as well. I suppose Ireland and Wales are out of a national team, then!

I think it’s already grounds for ejection.

Baskeball: Stop calling all the f**king fouls. You can’t watch 30 seconds worth of action without a foul.

New Rule: No blood, no foul!

This really isn’t a rule change, more of a change in traditions:

Let the spectators at golf matches and tennis matches scream their heads off, all the time. If a basketball player has to stand a the foul line and shoot with some bozo in a rainbow wig waving a "John 3:16) sign in his face, Tiger Woods should have to sink a putt under the same conditions. Likewise, Andre Agassi should have to serve for the Wimbledon title with someone screaming “Agassi, you suck! You couldn’t even satisfy Brooke Shields! What’s the matter, your dick too small?”

Okay, here are a few:

NFL Football: Do away with the Fair Catch rule. Kick receivers must try to run the ball back.

International-level hockey: No more shootouts to decide a tie game. If the object of the game is to win according to the rules of the game of hockey, then those rules should apply until a winner is decided. Having a shootout turns a game into a skills contest between players, not a competition between teams.

Figure skating: I agree with the poster who mentioned about Britney Spears music. There was a time when the rules stated that music had to be without lyrics–if this rule is not still in force at the top levels of competition, bring it back. (Most Spears-type stuff has no melody without lyrics, it seems, so if the skater insisted on using it, he or she would have to use elevator-music versions, like before.)

Any participant in any sport being interviewed: No more using the following statements:

“We/They came to play today.”
“We/They were prepared, but we/they were a little more prepared.”
“God was with us today.”
“We/They played a real good game.”

Oh, and football commentators are no longer allowed to use the word “football” as if they were paid by the mention. How many times have the fans had to put up with comments like, “He got the football and ran it down the football field for the biggest play of this football game, setting up his team to run the football in for a TD…” C’mon, guys, it’s not that hard to think of another way to put that thought.

How about : A serve that touches the net but lands correctly counts.

I think they’ve already started to do that in the college game.

As the XFL will learn with its “no fair catch” rule, punts will become very dull plays because the return man will more likely just let the punt fall to the ground and let it be downed rather than catch it and get clobbered.

Ahem. Most of the current Irish squad are, in fact, Irish.

Now what about that rule that says a country can get its players from a colony that gained its independence 25 years ago, huh? :wink:

They’ve already thought of that – the ball will be live, so the punting team will be able to pounce on it and continue its offensive series.

http://www.xfl-central.com/other/rules.shtml