Again I disagree. Most wars were not fought over religion.
Let’s cover a few of the more popular wars.
Vietnam (nope)
The french in Vietnam (nope)
Korea(nope)
WW2 (nope)
WW1 (nope)
Crimean war (nope)
The many wars and military actions of England durring the spead of colinization (boer (might be mispelled) actions in Inda and so on (nope)
The civil wars in almost every south american country (nope)
The American Civil war (nope)
The War of 1812 (nope)
The Revolutionary war (nope)
The French indian war (nope)
The many times the French and Eglish duked it out… I see no main religious reason there.
I never recall Rome going to war in the name of their gods, only for expansion and conquest.
Gengas Khan and his westward expansion (nope)
The crusades Absolutely!
If you look closer still, you will find human nature, and the quest of power glory and wealth the root of most motives
leading to violence and war.
To keep from hijacking this thread I shall start a new thread.
But he was also responsible for the creation of Constantinople, and the consequences of its never having been created would probably have lead to there being no Emperor Justinian, and hence, no complete compilation of Roman law. Since the Roman system of law has effected ours so much, this would probably have very negative consequences.
To fix the problem without killing Constantine, I would suggest instead killing Maxentius, his opponent at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, in order to prevent the battle from ever taking place. That was the one where he had the vision that lead to his interest in Christianity in the first place. As things stood, Maxentius died at Milvian Bridge anyway.
As a non-American with the gall to have an informed opinion on the US president who led the free world against the Axis, I humbly apologise to you for that opinion rendered totally insignificant by reason of the devastating accident of birth leading to my unfortunate and entirely regrettable status as a non-American.
I would like to nominate Otto von Bismarck. Would the Kaiser have been in possession of a country as well-run as Germany before he famously “dropped the pilot”, if not for Bismarck? Would he then have seen fit to declare war in WW1, decimate France, and wipe out the flower of a generation in the trenches?