I thought the same thing…however, a more cynical (or criminally inclined?) acquaintance proposed that maybe she hadn’t destroyed the stuff after all, but had done something rather more profitable with it. Has anyone seen any evidence that the stuff was destroyed rather than hidden or sold?
There is no punishment too bad for this benighted piece of offal. Destroying irrepleaceable art is just wrong (although I can’t too upset about shredding a Watteau painting. He was the most twee of the Rococo-era painters; how many frilly shepherdesses can one look at?)
There is no punishment too bad for this benighted piece of offal. Destroying irrepleaceable art is just wrong (although I can’t too upset about shredding a Watteau painting. He was the most twee of the Rococo-era painters; how many frilly shepherdesses can one look at?)
There is no punishment too bad for this benighted piece of offal. Destroying irrepleaceable art is just wrong (although I can’t too upset about shredding a Watteau painting. He was the most twee of the Rococo-era painters; how many frilly shepherdesses can one look at?)
As much as I try, I can’t get as worked up over this as many others seem to be. Yes, it’s theft and destruction of property. Yes, both he and his mother deserve to go to jail. I guess I just don’t much care for art. I mean, the guy stole paintings that I would have never seen, had never even heard of, and probably wouldn’t have much liked anyway.
Truth to tell, I’m with Blackknight. Especially when it comes to the paintings (which, as I understand it, were the only things irretrievably destroyed). We have pictures of these paintings, right? So, to me, if the original is destroyed, it’s a shame, but it’s not exactly a tragedy. It’s like if someone destroyed a first folio edition of Hamlet. It’s a shame and a waste, but it’s not like the world is forever deprived of the play.
See, that’s a bad analogy. The genius of Hamlet is in the words, not in the medium that conveys the words. There is no substitute for being in the presence of a great work of art. As many times as you may have seen Monet’s Bridge at Argentuil in books and posters, nothing can prepare you for the brain-melting beauty of the original. No copy can convey the colors, the brush strokes subtly visible on the surface, the size and setting of the original.
I agree with this. I was blown away seeing Starry Night. Just the feeling of being that close to such a legendary painting is enough, and it is so much more impressive seeing it in real life. Miller and BlackKnight I really don’t understand where you’re coming from. It is not the greatest tragedy in the world, but it is tragic that someone could destroy something like that out of anger or in order to cover her son’s ass.
Coldfire - and to keep herself in the clear, seeing as it was her house that he hoarded all the paintings and antiques in. Didn’t want to be an accessory. What a fucking scrotal flea.