Check them out. Is it me, or does James Madison look like he just had a stroke? George is looking frighteningly stern, which I suppose is fitting for a Father of a Country, but John Adams looks like a poncy git and Jefferson is smirking because he knows he has the thickest eyebrows of them all.
I wonder if they’re going to tarnish like crazy within 6 seconds of manufacture like the Sacajaweas did.
I’m inpressed that they got Noel Gallagher to model for the Jefferson coin.
Thing is, if the US Mint really wants people to start using dollar coins, they need to stop making fancy special-edition ones and just mint a few billion really dull utilitarian coins that people won’t think twice about using. The moment someone thinks: “That’s a neat coin, I’ll save it in this drawer,” that coin has failed.
On the contrary, they have succeeded. They have just made something for a few pennies that will never be redeemed. Why do you think the post office encourages collectors? Every stamp not used is greater profit than one that is.
Yep, my thoughts exactly. I personally hate all of these “special” edition stupid ass coins. The state quarters, the Sac dollar, now the president dollars. Just a way for them to make more money when nobody redeems them. Damn good marketing strategy though, have to give them props for that.
Washington looks like he wants to eat my liver with fava beans and a nice Chianti.
It’s a no-win situation with him, though. In life, he did not look much like the Gilbert Stuart (correct me if I’m wrong) portrait of him. AIUI, the artist was accustomed to portraying aristocrats, and couldn’t reconcile Washington, who was really more of a jock than a prep, with that. So he softened the lines of his face quite a bit, and gave the hint of a smile to a man who rarely smiled. But nowadays, if George is portrayed the way he really looked, people cry heresy.
That’s a bit misleading. I can think of the Roosevelt dime and the Kennedy half-dollar and the Jefferson nickel. But from the context of the article it seems they’re saying that it’s the first President on a dollar coin. Oops! There was the Eisenhower dollar from 1971 to 1978. Obviously they’re referring to the quarter-sized dollar. But the headline implies that there have been no Presidents on U.S. coins before, and that the new $1 coin will be the first.
Must come from having every bill look the same that you guys actually **look ** at the coins. They could produce a dollar coin in Australia with John Howard giving GWB a blowjob and, because it would be the same size, shape and colour as the coins that are sans blowjob, I and many others would never notice.
Yeah - I was stricken by the official statement expecting these to be “successful” as defined by “taken out of circulation.” Just seemed a little odd. Many people believe revamping our money system - including the possibility of dollar coins replacing bills - ought to be addressed somewhat more sriously than a desire to create collectibles.
I hope they look better in person than in that photo, cause those heads are butt ugly enough to serve as tails.
I suggest they try putting a popular person on the coin for a change. The Marilyn Monroe Dollar could be very popular. Knowing the mint they’ld call it the Norma Jean Dollar, and use a profile instead of the flying skirt image, while making it the same size as a quarter.
We look at coins so we don’t get stuck with Canadian coins, which are worth less than American coins, due to the exchange rate. I’d rather be able to stick in a dollar bill than a dollar coin, because I don’t like change in the pockets. The bill is in the wallet I have to carry with me anyways.
We get that here, to a lesser extent, with pound coins from Gibraltar, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands and other such esoteric places. These are worth the same as UK pounds in exchange-rate terms, but they are not generally accepted in shops – or at least not if the person on the till notices them.