You must be the only person on the internet that doesn’t know.
Or you are trolling
No, seriously, I was totally clueless. I even searched “RC helicopter news” and came up blank. Just now I searched “RC helicopter death” and found it.
Carry on.
No worries. Now, don’t you think a veiled wish for two members to take up a hobby that just had a horrible public death, don’t you think that is a clever way to troll?
I thought it was brilliant. Now some people might want to give the troll a free vacation in Belize, but I think he should get a gold star for being a clever troll.
FYI if you don’t get the Breaking Bad reference, vacation in Belize, you wouldn’t think it means anything. Just like the RC helicopter death wish.
It’s fucking clever. Of course the Mods may want to allow such things, time will tell.
But that’s exactly backwards.
Look, leave aside climate change for a moment and imagine pretty much any other claim. Let’s say Guy A announces that a giant meteor will strike the world and wipe out half of all mankind in the near future. Let’s say Guy B asks, “What do you mean by ‘the near future’, Guy A?”
We don’t need some Guy C to come along and accuse Guy B of being inchoate; Guy B doesn’t especially need to define much of anything. Rather, it’s Guy A who maybe means “within five years” – or maybe means* “within fifty years”* – or maybe means “Oh, I actually have no idea what The Near Future means in that sentence; someone told me it would happen In The Near Future, and I’m simply relaying his claim without knowing what the heck he had in mind.”
To borrow the phrase you use at the end there, it’s entirely possible that Guy B in fact has no idea what Guy A’s point is. And it’s entirely possible that Guy A has no idea what the point is, either. Guy A can make a vague claim – the team with the best quarterback will win the next Super Bowl, we’ll soon have a President who proposes a sensible agriculture policy – without spelling out what it means, and without even knowing what it means, while always able to say See I Was Right All Along.
Castigating the Guy Bs of the world is useless and misdirected so long as Guy A is out there doing his thing.
(tl;dr? The one making the claim is of course the one who should define his terms.)
Why do you hate science?
(GigoGallop, that is satire, I don’t really think he hates science)
That blog (that was also recommended by former skeptic scientist Barry Bickmore) is more accurate, and you are only cherry picking the year like the still anonymous blogessor from WUWT does.
As for:
We can add that to yet another of your lies like the “There is no evidence for water vapor feedback” or “No theory for this”.
http://www.apl.washington.edu/project/project.php?id=arctic_buoys
Hey FX, what oil company is paying you to shill their earth-killing lies? Shell? Exxon? 
BP
I agree, but what’s funny is that I’m perfectly happy to lay out my position.
If Gagundathar had simply read my posts, quoted whatever he found unclear, and asked me a simple, reasonable question about it, I would have been happy to answer.
But instead he lied about what I had said, and wished death on me.
Not only that, but he ignored my polite request for him to set forth his own position.
It looks like he is projecting his own insanity onto others.
Wait a fucking minute. First I am some stupid as hell moron that rants and makes no sense. Now I am a highly paid oil shill trying to cast doubt on … well … something. Global warming or climate change or whatever it is that nobody will actually just fucking define.
Can you people get your stories straight? I mean goddamn it, you can’t have it both ways.
Welcome to the goddamn internet.
On both of us.
But, hey, if you are going to let some anonymous fuckhead with nothing better to do worry you whilst posting on internet, you’re going to have a bad time.
Remember the complete fail of an Ad campaign from England where they blew kids to pieces for just asking questions? The horrific idea that somebody actually thought was a good idea?
That’s the level of insanity some of the vocal adherents of doom live in.
They actually filmed it, put it out there, then tried to pretend it never happened.
Dumb fucking assholes of the world. You make it hard for real scientists to be taken seriously.
Actually virtually all of the ones that I rely on condemned and criticized that, OTOH, there were almost no criticisms from the deniers at the Heartland Institute for putting ads that equated climate scientists with mass murderers.
And do you care to deal with all the lies that you have said so far?
Your language difficulties really are hindering you. If you weren’t such an insulting assbag I might care more. But it’s making you look stupid, when it’s more likely a misunderstanding you have with American culture.
I probably should explain so you can follow.
When I point out Tamino is arguing over which MODEL to use when discussing arctic temperatures, and then say “there are no measurements of the arctic”, it’s humor. It’s a joke.
It’s like if somebody is arguing over which temperature anomaly dataset is best, and then somebody says we still have no way to actually measure the global temperatures. Which is why we have to use different anomaly graphs, which do not agree with each other.
It’s a fucking joke. We actually measure global temperatures in all kinds of ways.
The joke is that people are fighting over what the temperature actually is.
Or what it means.
That was only **one **of your lies (that you are trying to pass a joke now, yeah, that will fly).
I think it is better that you learn to be honest and learn how to deal with all the lies you told others so far. Rather than the cheap shots you are reduced to do.
It seems that being a grammar Nazi is the only thing left for you then.
Since your information isn’t peer reviewed, it is invalid.
Good, because that applies to virtually all what is posted in WUWT and other denier sources. In any case the reality is that many other scientists do see the quality of the work from the author and that is the best peer review one can get outside of publication. (not to mention that he is also a published author).
But that was not the issue you liar, the research from Andrew Dessler regarding water vapor feedback was already published and peer reviewed.
Once again, your comments are invalid.
What? BP doesn’t pay you? Those mothefuckers…they told me to go to Exxon because they were paying you and Shell paid magellan and brazil. 
All of us earth-destroying shilling have to get paid, doncha know? 
Our evil cannot be our own, it must be paid 
I seriously doubt it.
Same 4 pathetic trolls (label them how you will-dried toilet crust for example is probably too good for them) I see, spewing the same bullshit, over and over and over again (you 4 fuckholes would make excellent perpetual motion machines to help solve our energy crisis, but I digress). It is because of lowlife scum like you that our planet is now in peril-enough of you bastards (that is, the ones with actual political clout, not pimply 300 pound fatasses such as the likes of you who jerk off to bukkake videos when they aren’t jerking off to some denier blog somewhere) have gotten into enough places of power that few countries are doing much about AGW (tho some are doing more than others, such as Germany, to their credit). Maybe one day you’ll repent your willful idiocy and ignorance and wake the fuck up, but I for one will not be holding my breath.