You know, if you hadn’t of quoted and responded to that wall of shit, I would have just ignored it.
But yeah, what a dick move. Now the Mods will be all over this thread and the shitholes will get it shut down.
Which is, of course, what they want more than anything.
You are even an ignorant on what is the Gish Gallop.
The last posts I made never did go but to one cite, and your Gish gallop was beyond what even Duane Gish would had dared to do.
Gish was a creationist but at least he had the courtesy of finding specific **contradictory **information that scientists had reported, you are really dumb for thinking that the gallop you posted has any contradictory information for me (indeed, you pointed to several sources demanding that I deal with them is a gallop, like if I was not aware of them before)
What is clear is that you still have the stupid idea that I would not welcome the information you posted because after all I’m supposed to be a pseudo scientist. As my latest example showed you are as deluded as many as I encountered before. The reality is that I can find even more evidence that supports me in the sites you pointed to; as demonstrated, those sites you put on your gallop do agree that there is evidence for the water vapor feedback showing that indeed you and your groupie lied to us.
As even the ones dealing with pseudoscience like Rationalwiki puts it, in their article on a denialist movie, Skeptical Science is a valid source. It was cited more than 5 times, among most of the cites from other groups and scientific organizations that you also cited so helpfully in your misguided idea that I do not check them also.
The pseudoscience is in you FX, all along.
tl:dr
Yeah, well you would dead wrong.
No, and that is stupid reasoning. It’s lazy, and it avoids you having to think.
Ass = Handed To. That was amusing.
I bet FXMasturbatingfuriously missed a couple of strokes, reading that. Or probably not, since he’s too stupid to realize he’s an utter fool.
Your contributions to this topic are just scintillating! What intellect!!
Things that Gagundathar made up
I’m pretty sure you didn’t actually read anything before you said the above. Nobody in this thread ever said anything like that, except you.
Nobody has said anything about flawed studies. It’s a troll post. And he got what he wanted so desperately
Attention
Look, I know now you suck at English. But please never stop being you. That shit is damn funny.
I know you can’t tell, because of the language problem. But it’s fucking hilarious when a non native English speaker fucks up his insults.
Are you sure there isn’t an SkS entry explaining (in easy/moderate/difficult levels) why they don’t have a definition for AGW?
Maybe it explains why asking for one makes you a denier?
Or worse, a fake sceptic?
BTW, what the fuck is a fake scpetic?
You do not know what an ignorant is? Your first problem is to think that that is an insult. So yeah, I do prefer to have trouble with language rather than being always wrong in a subject you claim to have knowledge.
What it gets me going is the certainty that you will never show your dazzling intellect in journals of peer reviewed science. Such a waste. 
How to be a Fake Skeptic
I was talking about your post #357, dumbass. How do you manage to remember to breathe without prompting, anyway?
Well I think he wanted to make one of the most powerful arguments his side of the debate has: If you don’t agree with the warmists, then you are a bad person. It’s not a logical argument; it doesn’t have merit; it’s based on pure emotion; but it still has a certain amount of power.
Which is such bullshit. Sometimes. However, the comparison with past scientific frauds, deceptions, and outright venality concerning things that effect health and safety, where there certainly is a concerted effort to obscure, undermine and to fling shit in regards to the eternal conflict between safety and health, I agree that some people are adamant in their stand due to vested interest. Like nuclear safety issues, smoking, oil pipelines and clear cutting. Damn building and bombing the living fuck out of Cambodia. I’m quite certain that he past (and present) is littered with examples of people with a vested interest doing all kinds of evil fucking shit to keep from having to change a single thing, and so they could keep making a lot of fucking money. It’s the way of the world.
It’s just not why I am a skeptic. I actually support most of the beliefs of the warmists. They are not bad ideals. I even go farther in my actions than most people I know spouting the party line of fear and doom. I just don’t believe in their doom.
tl;dr = It’s complicated
See above.
Just another label to smear your enemies with. It’s so much easier than engaging in a debate. Or explaining how you don’t agree with the evidence, or why certain scientists can’t be trusted.
Or how you know more than anyone else.
It’s like calling everyone who isn’t part of your religion/cult a name, to identify that they are not part of the one true skeptics society. Hence they should be burned. At the stake.
After being tortured. Until they recant.
Then you kill them.
In the old days it would be the same as “heretic”.
There is a real irony to that blog entry. Tamino was quite rightly complaining that the arctic shows a long term warming trend, and one year does not disprove “global warming”.
Which is why this year is so ironic. It actually is the coldest ever in the arctic this summer.
But, that still doesn’t disprove anything. It just means it’s fuckass cold this year.
Also, it’s funny that Tamino is arguing over which computer generated estimate of arctic temperatures one should use to look at trends.
there still is no temperature network, no sensors scattered around the arctic, so we can actually know what the temperatures are. This is true for land and ocean measurements.
It’s not just my humble self that realized SS is a pseudo-scientific blog.
Nothing cuts a believer off at the knees like pointing out their Bible is full of serious flaws.
For what? 
The inability for certain members of this non-debate to actually define their various and inchoate positions on this topic is quite notable. None of the points that the sane folks who are posting here have been addressed, namely that anthropogenic climate change is a real phenomenon and that there are fairly well known mechanisms for the causation of such.
It is amusing to see two of the least competent posters on this subject spend time posting text that fails entirely to either refute the commonly held scientific principles employed to make the determination about anthropogenic climate change or to present any viable contrary hypothesis. Instead, they rely upon schoolyard antics and projection of their own failing upon others to attempt to make some sort of point. What that point is, as noted above, is difficult to determine and one my even suggest that the posters themselves have no idea of what the point is either.
Finally, R/C helicopters are a great hobby.