Do you think you could provide precise definition of “climate change”?
For example, did the Little Ice Age count as “climate change”?
Only to people who don’t know the difference between weather and climate.
Since I know good and damn well the shit flinging monkeys will never answer.
Yes, the little ice age was climate change. Climate change is when the long term temperature, precipitation and wind values for a region change. Climate history shows many changes, both on the very long timeline, as well as within a few hundred years. Sometimes climate changes rapidly, usually it is gradual.
But extreme droughts and changes of climate in some regions are a well known feature of the last 5000 years (where we have archaeological records) as well as proxy data to know it happened.
The climate has changed in the last 150 years, which we known from good evidence. Extreme regional climates are mostly effected by changes in rainfall, not temperature.
Currently the data shows a gradual warming since the little ice age, punctuated by a short cooling period that ended in 1979 for many areas.
the little ice age is a well known climate change, despite what the insane warmists try to say.
Same for the MWP, and the Roman warm period, and the Holocene climactic optimum, around 5000 years ago, when sea levels were 3 meters higher worldwide.
See how easy it is to actually answer a question?
Now will the idiots among us please return to your one line commentary. Try to use the word “stupid” and act like you are smarter than anyone else.
I know you can do it.
Well the funny thing is that they don’t seem to consciously realize it’s a serious problem that they subscribe to a theory which they cannot define with any degree of precision.
You know, it might be just the sheer tonnage of monkey screeching and masturbatory rhetoric you and brazil84 are flinging in this thread that drove him, and just about everyone else, out. I know I, for one, lost interest in this thread when it became the FXMastermind and brazil84 show. Most of us have moved on to saner pastures.
But every time the weather changes, you come back into this thread to yet again claim victory by sheer volume of posts. It’s actually sort of fascinating- like if the two of you tell each other you’re right enough, even you will start to believe it.
I believe that just about everyone else is tired of feeding the troll. You know, if you feed him he’ll just follow you home, right? And I don’t think he’s house broken, plus he smells bad and had flees as well. Just give it some thought…there are a lot of decaffeinated sodas out today that are just as tasty as the real thing, so perhaps even if it’s cute you can just let this troll find some other new home.
Dude, FX, more than 1/8 of your posts are in this thread. I think you should consider taking a break. Maybe cut your losses and try not to get labeled as “that guy who spends all his time sarcastically arguing with himself in his own thread.”
The posse now has more than one member!
Oh, it’s way too late for that. What are we on, page 17? One of his nuclear power threads went for thirty pages and his post count in that thing was greater than all other users combined. There were parts where he was posting comment after consecutive comment for more than a week before some poor soul wandered in.
Oh man, that was him? I remember that thread but I must have tuned it out so hard I forgot who posted it. I guess he can count on people forgetting who he is because he concentrates all his inanity in easily-avoided piles, rather than reminding people here and there in various threads.
I find it extraordinarily considerate, actually.
Hey FX, how do you feel about soccer?
Lol, apparently reasonable arguments and questions = “monkey screeching and masturbatory rhetoric”
Mmmm, oh yeah, work the shaft.
And screeching – don’t forget the screeching.
e.g.
Screech screech screech!
Sarcasm is not the same as comedy. In fact, it’s more of a biting mockery than jest.
By now you can see that both record heat, and record cold, they both are proof of global warming. Which is exactly the point of the first post, and the entire thread. Of course there were massive tangents, with GIGOgalloper being challenged to define his terms (he never did).
With pointing out that the pseudo-science blog SkS doesn’t even have definitions for it’s major terms used. Much less any explanation of what AGW means, how we know it is happening, and the physics of GhGs causing warming.
But with cold now being firmly blamed o warming, cold events, especially the unusual and extreme cold and snow that has become more frequent, and deadly, cold events are now also global warming. And I hate the cold.
So fuck you global warming.
Your tactic is far more hilarious than anything I came up with. I can see why the shitbrains of the internet hate your very presence.
They will do anything, except have an intelligent discussion of scientific matters.
And yet it is quite easy, for any intelligent person, to describe both the theory, the physics, as well as the predictions. Why is that do you think?
Just saw this and thought you would enjoy it. It’s all sciency and shit.