I'm sick of this Global Warming!

Again, I can’t know what is said in secret, in private, much less thoughts people may have to keep to themselves. I do know that the secret forums of the SS blog were left open, and indeed there is dissent among the ranks, even there.

Certainly there is massive dissent when Dyson calls out the fools, or a scientist of good standing resigns in protest. Certainly it SEEMS like a mob mentality, and the reactions to any criticism screams “religious cult behavior” at times. But we are not privy to the inner workings of all the worlds experts, much less what they may truly think, but will not say.

The climategate emails certainly show arguments and dissent, especially over the changes to the records, and how to respond to critics. And we haven’t seen them all yet. Of course the secrecy over just the records scream serious trouble, and reading the emails leaves no doubt there was much fuckery afoot.

The adamant response that there was none, zero, not a bit of wrongness revealed in the emails, that certainly paints anyone who claims that as a believer.

Damn, there I go again, labeling people.

It helps to develop a thick skin, and to be able to laugh about it, especially at yourself. iT’S NOT LIKE WE ARE PUBLISHING IN SCIENCE BITCHES!

I was once offered money to edit Wikipedia (nothing to do with climate) and I turned it down. It was a corporation, and they wanted publicity, and I even like the guy who wanted me to do it, but I couldn’t. It sucks having a moral compass sometimes.

I see crap like that as parody, as comedy, because it’s hard to believe anyone actually thinks like that.

Plus the “fools” or “trolls” keep bringing up science, and it isn’t answered. It sort of makes the fuckhole John DiFool look like a troll or something.

Not that it matters of course.

Now, back to the real world …

Indeed… ( According to some? Try like the majority, fuckwit)

You missed the point, I was saying “some people claim the majority”, a subtle issue obviously lost on your amazing perception.

Also that article is shit.

Looking at several of the claims made in that ‘article’, you will see why it’s crap.

Claim #1

http://publications.iom.int/bookstore/free/MRS-31_EN.pdf

That paper repeats the debunked claim about the glaciers melting away that supply water to Pakistan, India and China.

Claim #2**

Complete horseshit scare tactics. The reason for the spread is air travel and no preventing infected people from bringing the fucking disease to another continent. It also repeats the mind numbing stupid that warming will allow mosquitoes to “migrate further north”. These idiots clearly never spent a summer in Alaska, Canada or Maine.

They actually think there are no mosquitoes in the arctic?

You are either a liar or a fool. Blaming the spread of disease on climate change, when you know good and goddamn well the real reason. Shameless.

Claim #3

http://www.who.int/publications/cra/chapters/volume2/1543-1650.pdf

More horseshit. They actually are making claims in that paper based on, wait for it, WARMER WINTERS!!

Yes, it’s that out of date, and that stupid.

Now cue the idiot monkeys here, please ignore science, and show us your ass.

…sexy, sexy Calvinball.

Seriously, I’ve wanted to fuck brazil for years, but damn! I just want to be all up in you, FX, you sexy bitch!
.

You better buy me dinner first.

If that’s true, then it lends credence to my hypothesis that people are motivated by status-seeking.

OMG you don’t know about the SS forum disaster. For some reason the private forums were left open to all, and boy was that shit interesting. I’ll find a link.

I’ve lurked on a lot of threads here in my years, but this is, hands down, the most retarded shit show I have ever seen. FX is basically having a conversation with himself, with a few others chiming in and patting him on the back. He actually quoted himself and responded above. “Priceless.”

And I still have no fucking clue what his position is.

Rant over, carry on.

You can’t make this shit up.

Scientific American is shit? Wow. You must have some pretty amazing credentials in climate science to be able to make such an pronouncement F’dX.

And no, I didn’t miss what you consider “subtle”, I was taking issue with it moron. The idiocy of your casual dismissal of what, as has been pointed out to you repeatedly, a majority of scientist, believe.

But do please submit your rebuttal to Scientific American on their article. I’m dying to see how your special insights are received by a reputable publication.

Pay attention jackass. I clearly said the Yahoo news story was shit.

The Scientific American article was a link within the Yahoo story. Jesus fuck, learn to read before you spew.

His position should be obvious Statij… FX’s doing a performance art installment with a severe case of diarrhea, which once he produces Brazil84 happily then guzzles down.

Being of somewhat less than astute nature, they find this as an agreeable methodology to manifest their revenge on the board, who they deem to be smug, complacent critics of their shortcomings by being luridly shocking in their rejection of convention. ( That and Brazil was quickly running out of posters to ban).

Clearly? You said an article was shit. The yahoo article happens to quote a lot of prestigious publications and studies.

When are you submitting your rebuttal to the offending source(s) of the information?

Og, your position is sooo flexible, its a marvel watching you play twister with the truth.

Wow…genius at work there Mastermind. Not.

Ever stop to think it might depend on the type of mosquito you expert you?

It’s okay FX, you’re just misunderstood. Now when the nice guys in the white coats come, please go quietly…

2 Posters 1 Thread!

HAWT!

It’s pretty damn funny when the fuckheads that won’t or can’t respond to any science accuse, and then post three times in a row, pretty much to himself.

Capped off with some other moron posting nothing but idiot stew.

Yet “they” complain the thread, the other members contribute nothing of substance. And you just know in your heart, they will never grasp what they do.

Meanwhile, in the real world, global warming is hammering the US, with a huge brutal cold front already spreading vast destruction, with a huge area of the US already 40-50°F below normal temps. x.com

Salt Lake City, Utah, airport got 5.8 inches of snow, shattering the previous record for the date by more than 2 inches. http://iceagenow.info/2013/12/salt-lake-city-shatters-snowfall-record/

There’s much more, with Europe and China already seeing unusual cold and snow, yet again.

The irony. Even with record snow and cold, and global temps not rising, the global warmer wants to blame even the cold on global warming. The supreme irony, they might be right.

well, we know he is some kind of climate change denier. I guess.

what I can’t believe is how they keep pointing to more severe winters - look, COLD! - as though it disputes planet warming.

climate science keeps evolving but one thing has been constant: the planet’s overall warming leads to greater extremes.

Oh look, it’s more goddamn scientific wisdom. What a complete surprise.

Typical fucktard lack of comprehension. I post science papers, studies, research about the goddamn changes we know are happening, in a critical area, or areas, the arctic and the NH boreal winters. but your typical fuckhead doesn’t even know why that is important, in regards to climate change.

Obviously reading and comprehension are not part of your equation, or maybe you just dropped in with out actually reading much. Please stop, it makes YOU look stupid. Seriously, it does.

That pernicious bullshit really needs to be shot in it’s zombie head. It keeps rising up from whatever swamp of ignorance these uneducated people live in. When the arctic warms up, that is when the extremes decrease. Like every goddamn summer each year. When the arctic regions are warm the jet stream decreases, moves north, and we don’t see extremes in weather. A warming in the polar region was predicted to cause less extreme weather in winters, with possibly more precipitation, but less as snow.

That is what the expert climate science consensus predicted. It’s a key feature of global warming, though from the ignorance people display it seems to not have been very well presented.

It was such a bastion of global warming than when there was a severe winter it was dismissed as “natural variation”, or “there will still be the occasional cold winter”, or “people are stupid it’s not really that cold”, this was exactly the response from most global warmers up until around 2006/2007. Even in the extreme winter of 2009/10 a lot of warmers were yammering how it meant nothing.

Then, when it became so fucking obvious you couldn’t possibly ignore the winters, nor would the “more snow because it’s warmer” line possibly work anymore, THEN we start seeing the theories about how the warming must be causing the cold.

Including the frank admission by a few real climate researchers that “Yes in some places the winters are getting colder”, but always with the view it is because of the warming.

Is that too hard to understand? If so, I can explain it using smaller worlds.