FXMastermind experiences a cool day in Atlanta and says this disproves the findings of the National Academy of Sciences of every country that has a National Academy of Sciences.
Brilliant!
Read up FXMastermind. http://climatecrocks.com/
What is really pathetic is how the freezing/cooling of the Southern Ocean (in Summer!) doesn’t faze the morons of the COGW. The heat capacity of the oceans is many times that of the land, and ocean comprises most of the SH above 40 degrees (the NH is the opposite).
But as I say, why let facts get in the way of religion?
You seem to think that is unusual, or somehow inconsistent with global warming.
He thinks “Church of Global Warming” is clever. Circumpolar circulation, icepack migration/expansion and surface chilling may not be things ralph has given much thought to.
Presumptions only get you in trouble … these clowns were tourists for the most part. A few climatologist thought to tap a new source of funding and set this up as a “Let’s do AGW research, kids”, took a few temperature readings and party-hardied. It was poorly planned and they got into trouble. Actual researchers are miffed, they’re in delay mode because important safety resources are tied up with these Eco-tourists. The idiots went in when they definitely shouldn’t have.
I have theories, I have a mess of theories … which one you wanna hear first? C’mon, cows ain’t as stoopid as we thunk they were. They fart for revenge !!! How about photoplankton’s ability to suck up CO2 is being interfered with due to the come back of whales (who eat photoplankton) Nuke the Whales, they’re trying to kill us.
I think we should work on keeping man-made cesium out of the environment first, then worry about CO2 … maybe there won’t be anything to worry about by then.
If you rely on dogma, then it is religion … if you rely on all the facts, then it is science.
Don’t worry, you’re equally underwhelming.
Well they deserve thought if they are the basis for interesting, consistent, accurate, bona fide predictions. On the other hand, if they are just after-the-fact rationalizations – i.e. epicycles – then they do not deserve much thought. Not in this context, anyway.
Yes, he needs to learn that NOTHING is inconsistent with the Sacred (But Undefined) Theory of Global Warming.
Where did you get that idea? There are lots of empirical data that would disprove global warming; unfortunately, none of it has been observed, and the overwhelming data over the last six decades supports the trend is for warming, not cooling. If you have global data to the contrary, post it; but a local cold winter ain’t it.
Please give me three specific examples. TIA.
Also, please let me know what you mean by “global warming” – is it simply the claim that global surface temperatures have been increasing? Or something more?
Well first I would need to know what exactly is being claimed.
How can it be empirical data if it’s never been observed?
Exactly.
Is this a whoosh? He wants to know what hypothetical evidence you believe would suffice to prove the prediction false. By all means repeat your claim that it hasn’t yet shown up – but you should answer the guy by mentioning what “it”, y’know, is.
[QUOTE=ralph124c]
What is really pathetic is how the freezing/cooling of the Southern Ocean (in Summer!)…
[/QUOTE]
Cite?
Cite for what? Fear Itself honestly believes ralph124c honestly thinks there’s more land north of the equator.
This thread is bad performance art. The two artists should each eat a bag of dicks after earliest convenience.
It could get ugly if you stand on your tippy-toes.
It’s not entirely clear what he wants, but I certainly want that. If Fear Itself has a shred of intellectual honesty he should answer the question or admit that he has no answer.
Please give me three specific examples. TIA.
Also, please let me know what you mean by “global warming” – is it simply the claim that global surface temperatures have been increasing? Or something more?
Science quickly gets non-trivial and surprising. Consider a recent thread about the remarkable mathematical conclusion:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + … = -1/12
The way that a warming Arctic can lead to severe cold storms in North America is also remarkable. A layman willing to click a YouTube can understand it, however.
No. What is really pathetic is how people with obviously substandard IQs think they know more than climate scientists just because they looked out their window and saw snow.
LOL. HTH.