Fine, I mentioned 2 other groups that investigate about bias that do.
The thing is, other sites or blogs can not avoid getting posters that are crackpots or assholes, in those cases “the broad brush argument” is valid.
VDARE gets their material and then posts it. I noticed that before, in another bogus paper that was used by you as evidence in a similar thread from a site like vdare. The fact that they do not take down clearly racist or bogus material that they have control on publishing or not, speaks volumes about where they are coming from.
I really did not know that. (I did indeed click on the link.) I assumed that the San Diego Union Tribune would have a site called SDUT.com, or something.
I have only used signonsandiego to locate restaurants and check the movie listings. (Hence this is why I thought it was a CoC thing.)
Thanks for pointing that out to me.
Media Matters does not impress me, as they have every bit as much of an agenda as either VDare or SPLC. Dragonfire impresses me even less, especially the article you cited where the author is taking many of his cues from the former. I, and try to digest it this time, do not disagree that there are elements to the site that can be fairly characterized as racist. But I do not think it makes everything on the site racist.
As far as their controlling their content, Brimelow is trying to give voice to those whose voices are not heard in the mainstream media. Sometimes those views are what I would consider extreme or, as far as an article you had pointed out one time, the analysis is sloppy. I do wish they wold take a hardr line on would they might include under their banner. I think it would sharpen the debate in a good way. It would also prevent people from ignoring good information and articles through their broad brush accusations.
When you falsely accused me of “backpedalling”, I then pointed out that my response had been one of pointing out the manner of their racism. THAT was addressed with my actual earlier statement that you are ignoring:
You claim that the author is just posting things that don’t get aired elsewhere. I note he posts pseudoscience that denigrates non-whites or which elevates whites–and only such stuff. He does not post anything that is ignored by the mainstram media that says good things about non-white groups; he does not post anything that is ignored by the mainstream media that denigrates whites. He is not looking for information that is simply being ignored. He deliberately selects only those things that are demeaning to non-whites. While I am sure that you have some other interesting adjective to describe a site that constantly publishes pseudoscience and lies to promote one perceived race over others, the adjective that I find most accurate is “racist.”
As it seems to be generating more heat than light, I hereby officially rescind my citation to the VDare article and substitute for it the following embedded cite therefrom, which says all I was trying to establish anyhow:
I’m less impressed by your effort to dismiss them, they even post links to what they are referring to, we are free to then see if they are correct or not, and I have to wonder why an agenda to check for accuracy in the media turns into… an agenda to put the white man down?
Yeah, I see here once again your tactic to assume we easily forget that we are in this situation because we found before that the information you pointed before coming from those sources to be weak or misleading, (notice that there was not mention of those articles as being racist) unlike tomndebb I see more crack pottery than racism.
Once again we ignore that “information” because when it is not racist it is often bogus.