And seriously, what’s to stop me from building a pool of mercury in Libertaria? Mercury is a natural element, it’s my property, and I’ll have the coolest pool parties in town. Who’s gonna stop me? What are you gonna do? Regulate a naturally occurring element?!
Besides, I’ll buy contamination insurance too, so when it leaks into the ground, and ends up in yours and all my neighbor’s water and soil, I’ll be just fine.
Your “logic” is non-functional. You are wrong. Regulations that mandate mask use by the public would not reduce influenza death. Continuing to argue that they would “just because” is simply foolish.
You are effectively making libertarianism look foolish here.
We observed significant reductions in ILI during weeks 4-6 in the mask and hand hygiene group, compared with the control group, ranging from 35% (confidence interval [CI], 9%-53%) to 51% (CI, 13%-73%), after adjusting for vaccination and other covariates. Face mask use alone showed a similar reduction in ILI compared with the control group, but adjusted estimates were not statistically significant. Neither face mask use and hand hygiene nor face mask use alone was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of ILI cumulatively.
==================================
Cool. Hand hygiene should be similarly legislated.
Terr, your cite says that the facemask using group was not different in ILI rate from the control group.
I admit that with your last assertion and your presentation of evidence against your own assertion, I’ve lost track at this point about the direction of your argument and its relevance.
But the facemask+hand hygiene group showed 30-50% reduction. As I said, that just shows that hand hygiene should be legislated as well. You know, “if it saves just one life”…
Oh and I forgot - children! What about the children? If you’re against the mask/handwashing legislation, that means you want children to die.
What Terr is trying to get across here is that,* if you regulate anything, you should regulate everything. And since regulating everything would be bad, no regulations would be best!*
It’s not what you call a reasonable framing of the issue. In fact it’s pretty darn shitty. But since arguing logically for this is impossible, he has to divert the issue to random nonsense, like legislating face masks for the populace.
That way, if he wins the random nonsense argument (by stamina) then he can try to sideways suggest he won the overall argument.
This doesn’t make the failed ideology of Libertarianism look like anything but a shambles of assertions and wishful thinking.
LOL. Not like I expected to change your mind. You keep clinging to the “the Big Daddy government knows better than the little people what’s good for them” doctrine.