Even if Disney buys Sony, Amy Pascal still has personal rights on distribution of Spider-Man and related properties that she negotiated while she was Chairman of Sony Columbia Pictures. She was the stumbling block Marvel getting the rights to use Spider-Man in Civil War, Infinity War, and Endgame, and was behind the effort to end the agreement to allow the MCU to continue to feature the Tom Holland Spider-Man character.
I’m pretty sure that that is exactly who he is referring to.
It’s a much more formal title, one that Odin’s father also held, and one that Thor himself may hold one day, but it is not referring to any being outside the Asgardian royal family.
How does that even happen? She works for Sony, but in the negotiations she ends up with distribution? Is that common? I thought all that crap was over when she quit/got fired from Sony.
It is not unusual for a studio head to get a producer or executive producer credit on some number of movies even if their involvement was minimal, but Pascal apparently negotiated a deal into her contract giving her broad production rights over Sony’s Spider-Man franchise independent of her position at SPMPG. Since that is basically the main revenue stream supporting all of the other films in development by Pascal Pictures, I can’t see her agreeing to sell the rights back to Marvel for any price they would be willing to pay for rights to a single character.
Yeah, the Netflix shows are of questionable canonicity and while the Marvel Televsion/ABC shows (Agents of SHIELD, Agent Carter) are notionally canon, featuring as they do characters from the films played by the same actors and referencing back to the films in many ways, Marvel Studios has essentially ignored them in terms of any continuity or impact. The Disney+ limited run series, however, are produced by the same people making the films and are intended to explicitly tie into and set up future film projects, and are basically a recognition of both the dominance of the steaming content model over traditional film distribution and the canvas that such longer formats offer for narrative storytelling.
Jack Kirby. Or possibly Stan Lee. The very very tippy-top of the power tree in Marvel. And of course Loki will always refer to himself as a God. His ego demands it.
There are things in the comics that muddy things up. Ragnarok is seen as a cyclic event. A whole different crew of Norse gods were involved in a climactic battle. They had familiar names and roles but looked different. Thor had red hair and a beard. Most of them were killed. Those that survived merged somehow (don’t remember how) into the Odin we know. The destruction of Asgard was seen as a bright star in the sky over Bethlehem (I wish I made that up). That was back in the early 80s.