I agree that the issue here is whether you want to work for this company, or not. They have stated policies about leave, and people are going to come work for them with the intention of using them as stated. If I interview with a company and they promise family friendly policies, and paid maternity leave, then I expect to be able to use them without getting crap about it. Otherwise I would have gone to work somewhere else. Similarly, I understand that if I don’t take use of these policies, other employees are free to do so, and if I have a problem with my workload, I take it up with my manager, not my co-workers.
Women of childbearing age who wish to work and raise children often take jobs that are compromises for them. I specifically work at my company because it gives me flexible hours and lets me job share so that I can work part time and be home with my child. I compromise because it is not the highest paying job in my field and there is not much room for advancement for me here. It is true that I chose to do it this way, but the truth is someone is going to suffer no matter what. Either I burn myself out trying to work full time and raise kids, or the kids suffer from lack of involvement, or my career suffers because of my lack of involvement.
People, especially women, who chose to have kids don’t do so because of all the great perks they will get in terms of aid or paid leave or available benefits or whatever. I am planning my maternity leave now, it will start in December. It is not going to be a vacation, yet many of my co-workers ask me when my vacation starts. I do have to use up all my paid leave on my maternity leave though, so there will be no actual vacations for me in the near future. That is a choice I make when I become a parent. But it is not a “happy fun time” leave of absence. Not to say I don’t enjoy bonding with my newborn baby, but it is exhausting and a lot of work.
There are many perks to having children, and there are many perks to not having children. It is essentially silly and pointless for either group to go around wishing we all could have it both ways. I don’t get luxurious vacations, I can’t leave at a moment’s notice on a weekend trip, all our extra money goes to college savings and baby items, etc. I gave that up when I chose to have kids, just as people who don’t have babies ‘give up’ maternity leave. I am sure those without kids end up financially ahead even without the paid leave!
Believe me, if I could choose a way to have a baby that would not leave my body exhausted and recovering, if I could figure out an easy way to breastfeed a child every 2 hours around the clock and still be capable of working, I would do it. Saying it is all a choice is short sighted. Yes, I choose to have children, but there is only one way to have them (aside from adoption - but many companies allow leave for this too) and society as a whole needs to deal with the fact that women will have babies. As others have pointed out, the alternative that women of childbearing years just stop working is neither fair nor possible, and I believe, would be a true detriment to working society as well. Women of my age are some of the most educated women the workforce has ever seen, and childbearing years are limited. To say we must choose an all or nothing approach to having babies is a waste, IMO.
That said, anyone who knows when they will be taking a leave from work for any reason should do everything they can to get their work done before they go, and I do that. If, however, I talk to my boss about a project that is pending and he says “don’t worry about it, we’ll take care of it” then I will do that. If someone gets stuck doing it that didn’t want it, they have an issue with the boss, not with me. My terms of employment and my job reviews are taken up with my boss, not my co-workers (although for the most part, I do get along with my co-workers very well.) If someone tries to shove work off on me that is not part of my job, I refuse it and tell them to take it up with my boss.