In which Mangetout takes the upper hand with telemarketers.

Telemarketing? My first guess since somebody was calling jsgoddess and trying to sell magazines.

I’m going to say calling “strawman” on that is itself a strawman argument.

I didn’t see that suggested. It did however suggest that some telemarketers seem to enjoy annoying people. It also reinforced my statements that telemarketers are assholes. It’s OK KIWI, I’m sure all of us can admit to being some kind of asshole for a month or so. Don’t be so hard on yourself. You don’t need to defend your long ago temporary state of assholiness to us.

Given the nature of “these people”, that’s not unadjacent to saying that anyone defending street vendors also has to defend muggers.

It’s even more adjacent to saying that anyone who works as a teacher has to defend the ones you read about in the news, or anyone who works in nursing has to defend the ones that steal drugs, etc. Sorry, I don’t think I should be held accountable for the actions of others in my industry.

While the first two people were obviously psychos and can’t be defended, how about their products and tactics?

How about calling a business, saying you have a manual for their copier, getting the information from them, sending them a manual, charging them for it, all because of your slick line of patter?

How about calling from “Ameritech SBC” and saying you’re a third party biller authorized by Ameritech SBC?

How about calling about a magazine, sending free issues, then sending a massive bill?

You see, I’m not just complaining about the psychos. I’m complaining about things that may be legal but sure as hell aren’t right. And it’s not a few telemarketers here or there. It’s hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of calls.

Do you know how much stuff we get in the mail? Free samples, but they’ll send a bill later, magazines that we “ordered,” but no one here said yes, reference materials that we don’t need and would never have agreed to take?

Do you know how many times SBC changed our long-distance carrier because they were told we agreed to it, and do you know that if someone changes your long-distance carrier, even if it’s without your permission, SBC charges you to change it back?

Do you know how many times I’ve had to explain to new receptionists that if anyone calls about the copier or the printer or toner it’s a scam?

Do you know how many calls I’ve ended having to take because a receptionist can’t tell a telemarketer from a legitimate call?

Do you know how many times we get a dozen calls in a week all offering the same safety program and all asking for the same person who hasn’t worked here for ten years, but they won’t stop calling until you threaten them with legal action?

These aren’t exceptions. This is the way the industry works. This is the way they have designed their industry. This is the way they have chosen to do business. This is the way they do things. This is not a small handful of anomalies. This is every fucking day of my working life.

So, if someone is going to defend telemarketers, they are going to have to defend what telemarketers actually do. I’m not interested in what the job might be, in theory. I want a defense of what actually happens. If that can’t be defended, then telemarketing can’t be defended. Otherwise, you might as well attempt to defend some other non-existent entity, like a tall Oompa-Loompa.

Matters may differ in the US, but in the UK these things are not legal. Bitch to your senator, not to me. Until then, as I said before, you cannot lump the bods trying legitimately to sell something but annoying you in the process with a bunch of scamming criminals.

Sorry, jsgoddess, that came out a little harsher than I intended it to. The bit about bitching to your senator was my opinion of what you should be doing, not criticism.

Oh FuckCryinOutLoud.

You already shit all over this thread Evil Death. Why throw out a wimpy apology now?

You just don’t seem to be able to distinguish between law breaking and ethics. No one cares that telemarketers are legal.

The plain fact is that they are ASSHOLES!

Scammers have one very large thing in common with telemarketers. They are using the phone system to make a pitch for money - to people who DO NOT WANT TO BE BOTHERED BY THEM!

I know, I know - argue with the idiot and observers may not be able to tell which is which

(Bolding mine)

I’m guessing you’ve never had mobility problems?

If you meant “cooler” in the sense of “more level-headed,” then yeah, normally, I am. This issue is a sore point with me. If you meant “cooler” in the sense of “hip or stylish” then you were waaaaay off, dude.

Now, on any other subject, this isn’t the sort of argument I’d dream of making, but if you’re not an American, you really don’t know jack about telemarketing. It’s a whole different ball of wax in this country. Before the DNC, telemarketing calls were constant. Always, without exception, at least five a day. Often upwards of twenty. And being polite? Here’s how being polite to a telemarketer works around here:

Shitheel: Hello, would you like to…
Me: I’m sorry, I’m not interested. Would you please put me on your do not call list?
Shitheel: Douche. <hangs up>

He was one of the nice ones. I’ve had telemarketers get the operator to interupt in the middle of a phone call to sell me crap I don’t want. These people are shameless and without morals. TellMeImNotCrazy, you’re not a blameless worker being held account for a few bad apples. You’re more like the concentration camp guard who let a few Jews escape. You may be a decent person, but you were the exception to your occupation.

Not to mention, with your mom, you can just say “mom, I just sat down to dinner, I’m starving” and she’ll reply “okay honey, call me back when you are done”, not "Oh, but wait, I’ve got this really good deal, you HAVE to listen…blahblahblah (won’t shut up you have to end up hanging up)…

:smiley:

Likely not to ignore your example, but because they were too busy with the anti telemarketer part of this “debate”.

Anyway, there is a difference, a big one. Mail, even just junk mail sits there and waits for YOU to go to it. It doesn’t jump out of the box, and come annoy you when you’re busy doing other stuff. Nor does it argue and get all aggressive and hardsell on your butt as you’re throwing it away in the garbage.

So even though its presence is annoying and uninvited, it’s dealt with in mere nanoseconds, and only after YOU’VE pursued IT (by going to your mailbox). So even with junk mail, you still have more of a choice in the matter than with telemarketing calls.

Clearly your mother, unlike mine, is prepared to take no for an answer.

You must be my long lost twin…or our mothers are anyway.

I meant in the level headed way…dude. I have noticed this is a sore point for you.

This is good news. I shall make good use of my get-out-or-arseholishness-free card :smiley:

But Junk mail needs to be taken up the long driveway! You pick what annoys you more and I will do the same :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=Princhester]
You’re trying really really hard to find the appropriate strawman, aren’t you? How many more things are you going to hang on the anti-telemarketers participating in this thread in some desperate attempt to make it seem we are saying something unreasonable?

[QUOTE]

I think you are over reacting. Shoot me. It’s not a desperate attempt just trying to explain that not everyone is so easily rattled. I’m not trying to take away your fun :slight_smile:

I feel no guilt. And unethical? Hey I wasn’t a tv preacher :smiley:

Well I should have done one big response. Now I do feel guilty :slight_smile:

Nobody is saying you shouldn’t get annoyed about things that annoy you; nobody is asserting that their annoyance over telemarketing nuisance trumps your annoyance over junk mail, pushy fast food staff or tricky bottle tops. Nobody is even suggesting that telemarketing is the number one annoyance in their personal hit parade. Please tell me that you do understand this.

I do :slight_smile: