Well, most of my GQ’s don’t get much response, so maybe this one will, as it deals with:
FOOD!
Anyhow. In India, is there a difference typically seen between cooking done by Muslims vs. that done by Hindus? And I don’t mean just the obvious factor of allowable meats per se - what I’m wondering is if the spices, vegetables, preparation, etc. are very different, or if there is a large difference in style between them?
Also - as a side question that is of great interest to me - can someone point me to a site with good beef-based curries? Even if they are not “real” Indian food, I’m looking for suggestions and ways to branch out from chicken/pork/prawns, that do not involve seafood or fish.
[sub](I ask for a site or link because I fear that soliciting recipes here would violate the spirit of GQ, whereas asking for a place which has recipes like this can yield a factual answer.)[/sub]
I’ve always found the difference is regional rather than divided on religious grounds. Each region of the Indian subcontinent has different styles of currys.
For really rockin’ beef curries, look farther East. Thailand has IMHO the best curry tradition. Also, look at North Indian muslim type food as well. Muslims had no qualms with eating meat, except for pork:D
There are also some curry type dishes in Etheopia called wat. Not sure if they are close enough for you.
Thank you everyone for the responses. Well, except for the cannibalism one. :eek:
Mainly, I wanted to know if when I fix “Indian” curry if it was something cross-cultural, or more regional. This sort of developed out of a discussion by Fierra and me over the difficult time finding beef curries either in London or in Kansas City.