hey! i’ve seen a clip on youtube about a man talking something about this:
'imagine an artist painting a picture of an artist painting a picture of an artist painting a picture and so on… of an artist painting a picture of a landscape…infinite regression, where the artist becomes both the observer and the observed.Through this example he sad that time is a freeway with an infinite number of lanes. what did he mean? i’m awaiting your replies.thank you gentlemen !
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
I have no idea.
[Quote=cmyk]
You get the idea…
[/quote]
Without actually seeing the video the OP alludes to I can’t be sure, but it sounds like the video author may have been either getting at multiple parallel universes (which would explain the “infinite lane highway”) or the theory that we’re a simulation embedded in a simulation etc (which explains the infinite regression), or some combination. That or he was some proponent of some wacky Time-Cube-esque theory and we’ll never figure out what the video author was on about without seeing the video (and even then…).
I just gotta ask. . . This wasn’t by any chance a snippet of “Escape from the Planet of the Apes,” was it? Eric ‘Victor Newman’ Braeden, portraying Dr. Hasslein, mentions this somehow in connection to how the apes were able to time travel.
Going by the description in the OP (which is all we have), the only reasonable conclusion to draw is that the creator of the video is an idiot (and/or drug addled) talking grandiose and incoherent nonsense.
That, of course, is assuming that such a video even exists, a claim for which we have been given no evidence, even though it would to have been very easy to provide.
Here’s a link (CULT MOVIE REVIEW: Escape from the Planet of the Apes (1971) | John Kenneth Muir) that shows the picture of the infinite regress of artists, and provides this quote from the movie "Time is like a freeway, a freeway with an infinite number of lanes. All leading from the past into the future. However not the same future.”
Pretty much everything you read about the Planck scales is just educated guesswork. Spacetime might be quantized, but nobody’s really sure about that. If it is, there might be a smallest possibly quantity of time, but there are other ways it might be quantized, too. If there is a smallest possible quantity of time, then our best guess as to how big it is is the Planck scale, a set of units that falls out of mashing some fundamental physical constants together in the right way. But even if there is some smallest unit of spacetime, nobody would be in the least surprised if it turned out to be pi times the Planck scale, or the Planck scale divided by the square root of two, or something along those lines, and frankly, we wouldn’t be all that surprised if it turned out to be completely unrelated to the Planck scale, either.