Nope, that is what people that looked at what took place report, I was not. Of course, for many on the right, it is better to dismiss a poster in a thread rather than what was reported. As it usually happens, Trump and the sources you use continue to mislead many. The sanctions that Trump begrudgingly signed were approved by congress.
“Trump’s early fawning of Putin sent strong signals that the U.S. would not be pursuing a tough policy towards Russia,” said Susanne Wengle, a political scientist at the University of Notre Dame.
Congress felt it had to get involved because both parties feared Trump could not be trusted with Russia, and they didn’t want to leave him the unilateral power to end sanctions via executive order, said Yoshiko M. Herrera, a University Wisconsin-Madison political scientist.
So, not credible to try to ignore what political scientists reported, (now that is pathetic)
Trump has made a career of claiming to take credit for many things after he was compelled to do so.
You printed opinion that you agreed with and then used it in an argument against something that I never said… If you think Trump signed something he didn’t like because Democrats wantedit then that’s amazing conclusion to make. Especially in light of Democrats changing their position when Biden removed the sanctions.
Duly noted that you will avoid what serious researchers pointed out. Incidentally, I’m just saying, your opinion lacks a mess of context. And that is what Trump and the Republicans in congress repeating this sorry talking point depend on.
Again, the Trump “hero” does not look as impressive on that when one looks at the context that was omitted before. Incidentally, it was pointed out why Biden removed those sanctions, omitting that is part of putting the lipstick on the Trump pig.
Regarding the OP, I do think that in any case the inflation issue and history does tell me that the Democrats are likely to lose the house. What is sad is that Republicans will not do much to solve the issue. In reality, I expect most of them to make it worse for women, minorities and the poor in the US. (As the latest votes in congress show)
Instead of looking at the economic issue, most items like climate change, help to needy families, immigration reform, health care reform, etc. will not see progress. A Republican victory will be seen by them as a mandate to make things worse in many other issues.
Many will vote to get the candy, and they will not even get that.
If every country refused to send oil to the US we would run out of oil. We’d still export the oil that is mismatched to our refineries (or stop producing it if we re-ban exports) and shut down the refineries that can’t get their foreign supply.
I decided to test the assumption. You know, the one made… by a Trump supporter, which we all appeared to accept… that America had achieved energy independence as defined by the country producing more oil than it consumes.
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Daily Production (1000s brls)
7559
7890
8931
10103
11807
12783
12354
13140
15310
17114
16458
16585
Daily Consumption (1000s brls)
18322
17993
17581
17992
18111
18499
18593
18845
19417
19424
17183
Balance
(10,763)
(10,102)
(8,650)
(7,889)
(6,304)
(5,716)
(6,239)
(5,705)
(4,107)
(2,310)
(726)
(2,099)
Annual Deficit (all barrels)
(3,928,601,309)
(3,687,341,511)
(3,157,165,802)
(2,879,354,461)
(2,301,122,175)
(2,086,292,725)
(2,277,248,031)
(2,082,433,418)
(1,498,907,737)
(843,085,952)
(264,849,275)
(766,220,130)
I grew suspicious when I realized that someone was making a statement of fact about an measurable benefit arising from the Trump administration.
Did this benefit, in fact, occur?
Turns out it did not, that the US was never “oil independent” during the Trump administration or, frankly, at any time since the mid-1960s. To be more precise, the trends were tending towards ‘independence’ but it did not happen.
From:
To be fair, this isn’t so much on Magiver but on us for accepting this as fact. We… including myself… should know better. We’re Dopers.
In 2020, the United States exported more petroleum than it imported – marking the first time that has happened, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s February 2021 Short-Term Energy Outlook.
However, EIA expects the U.S. to return to being a net petroleum importer in 2021 and 2022 due to declines in domestic crude oil production and corresponding increases in crude oil imports.
FFS people can we please stop using outdated third-party summaries of government data instead of the source. Nobody who has any business talking about energy needs this:
Imports and exports are largely decoupled because, again, we aren’t importing and exporting the same kinds of oil. We could double domestic production from current plays and we still wouldn’t be “independent”.
Imports have been relatively flat over the past two years and are lower than pre-pandemic. Production began rebounding about a year ago.
John Oliver’s show this week was on inflation. He tears apart the ridiculous oversimplification that the current rise is caused by the U.S. “printing money” and shows that it is far more complex and worldwide.
Governments don’t “print money” to increase the money supply. Using this metaphor is inaccurate and can be misleading to the extent it conjures up notions of Weimar.
What you miss is that it depends on the region of the US you are talking about, it is more complicated than the oversimplification you are pointing at.
What Magiver is also missing is that Ruken is one of our experts in this field. Usually don’t want to argue from authority here at the SDMB, but in this case it’s a valid point.
