Inflation is not currently a menace

Technically, what happens is that the Federal Reserve buys treasuries from the government, adds them to its balance sheet, then makes an offsetting adjustment, essentially transferring newly created money to the government account. The government then issues cheques against that money.

This might as well be ‘printing money’. It increases the money supply beyond normal supply/demand.

In the past, ‘Quantitative Easing’ was largely used to shore up bank reserves, and didn’t necessarily flow into the economy other than that it allowed banks to lend more money. That’s also money creation, but it only happens if there are people who want to borrow the money. Under that kind of QE, the fed could just reverse the transfer as bank liquidity improves, and the money doesn’t really move. You could see that in the data from the 2008 crisis, where the volume of money increased because of QE, but at the same time the velocity of money declined, keeping the money supply relatively stable.

The difference this time is that the government took that money and helicopter-dropped it on the population. That was about the most inflationary thing they could possibly do, and it was done partially with that intent, only they thought they were preventing DEflation from the drop in demand due to the pandemic.

When you drop all that money on people to simply spend, it’s pretty much ‘printing money’.

It should be obvious that it’s complex, and not due to just one thing. Inflation is happening for a host of reasons, including supply chain issues, labor shortages, energy prices skyrocketing, food going up for a number of reasons, etc. But monetary expansion is a big part of it. And yes, it’s global, but that’s because pretty much every government did the same spending with borrowed money.

Here’s a chart of the M2 momey supply since 2000. It’s supposed to grow with GDP growth plus enough to keep inflation mildly positive. Have a look at what happened in 2020 and after.

Right now, interest rates at 2.5% are expansionary when inflation is 9.1%. Deficit spending of the levels that have been going on is also inflationary, because there are no lenders for the amount of money being borrowed and the Fed has to provide it.

I’m not going to tell you exactly how much of our current inflation is due to X or Y. No one knows, as so many things have been changing and it’s a complex world.

We also don’t know how long it will last. But basic monetary theory suggests that the massive monetary expansion that’s gone on in the last two years is playing a big part, and it will continue to have an inflationary effect until the money supply shrinks back down to a realistic number - probably through a steep recession plus even higher interest rates. You could still have inflation after that, but it would be due to other factors like supply chain issues or a drop in productivity.

It’s not oversimplification. There is no origin/destination that can’t be connected via ship, pipe, or rail in the event of an oil embargo. You’re just arguing to defuse the fact that gas is much higher under Biden and it’s jacking the cost of everything else up. This is a thread about inflation which we are currently experiencing. It’s hurting a lot of people.

Nope, you are just moving the goalposts, your argument was about not being dependent.

I tend to side with Gigobuster on this, especially if we are talking about the short term. Just because you theoretically have enough proven reserves of oil and gas to meet your energy needs to be ‘independent’ doesn’t mean you are if you don’t have the refinery capacity and transport networks available to process it all and get it to customers, or if you don’t have it in the right mix to meet your energy needs.

The U.S. is a net energy exporter, and has been since 2019. That"s different from being ‘energy independent’, or it wouldn’t have needed to import 22.87 quads of energy last year even though it exported 23.48 quads.

Biden is responsible for a certain amount of higher gas prices, though, by shutting down Keystone XL, canceling drilling leases, shutting down ofshore drilling, etc. Gas prices are a mix of supply and demand and the anticipation of future supply. If people think gas will be scarcer in the future, they will bid up prices today.

Refinery capacity is also down in the U.S. When the lockdowns happened and demand plummeted, a number of refineries were closed. Only about half of the closed ones have re-opened.

And as long as we export more than we import we ARE energy independent unless you can explain why we can’t move assets from point to point.

What if you are exporting natural gas and heavy crude oil that you don’t have the capacity to process, and importing light sweet crude? You have way more natural gas than you need, but not enough gasoline for cars. Technically you are a net energy exporter, but your infrastructure is built around a mix of energy that you can’t domestically supply. That’s a hypothetical way in which you can be a net energy exporter and still not be energy independent.

You burn more of what you have and less of what you don’t or use it for trade.

there is no impetus on Biden’s administration to support oil production. His solution is to create millions of union jobs in clean energy. :roll_eyes: In other words, go begging to Saudi Arabia for oil. He owns this inflation mess.

Again I would defer to experts and others in this tread, you don’t have the evidence here. As for inflation, once again you are oversimplifying. This is a case where there are many reasons for the inflation, blaming just Biden is a very silly argument.

The short video by John Oliver posted early shows how silly the Republican arguments are, starting with the bit he mentioned about Moody Analytics, according to them if the stimulus to deal with the corona economic downturn had not been done (an item that the Republicans use to blame Biden for the inflation of today), we would had come close to suffer a double digit recession in 2021. So for that item, it is not fair at all to forget about what it could had taken place with no stimulus. A big part of the inflation increase that we are seeing after the invasion of Ukraine, is the fault of Putin.

Meaning that if we do give the power to the Republicans in congress, we are doing what Putin wants.

I consider actually having enough product I can put in my car more than a “convenience”, but YMMV. If you have a plan to swap, say, Pine Bind off of Alberta gunk and onto Balkan light sweet, hie thee to Koch and start collecting those light sweet consulting bucks.

Doubtless this post has something to do with imports, both overall and from the Saudis, having decreased from what we saw during the Trump years.
Also something to do with the number of rotary rigs in operation having increased 150% over the past 18 months.

Putin wants us to open up domestic energy production via ANWR and the Keystone Pipeline? Because those are the things Republicans want and Biden doesn’t.

I’m guessing he wants Russia’s Nord Stream 2 opened. Which is what Biden wanted and Trump opposed.

Biden’s energy policy has favored Putin at the expense of US production. He owns the problems we’re having with inflation and it’s absolutely a menace. He’s useless.

This, as was pointed out even by conservatives in this message board, is only half the history; and there is always a reason from a number of right wing sources to tell it that way.

One important thing missing in that rant, is that electing Republicans that would follow misguided nationalistic ideals will lead to less support for NATO and other efforts to deal with climate change, because that issue will not go away, as much as Republicans would like it.

One thing that I’ll note is that a lot of inflation is due to supply chain issues. While some of that supply chain is abroad, and we can’t do anything about it, I understand that there are also a lot of domestic positions that are currently unfilled and that simply can’t find enough workers.

It seems like there are roughly 1m soldiers stationed in the USA who are probably doing little more than polishing their boots every day and being real ready to not do a lot.

Any reason to not loan them out for a few months to all the factories and docks that are bottlenecking everything else?

Make California a “Logistics Free Zone” for interstate freight. If they want to screw themselves that’s fine with me. Let the voters figure it out. But give interstate truckers autonomy over their equipment and livelihood.

Right now they don’t allow trucks older than 2010 to operate in the state and AB5 bill is an unnecessary intrusion on their livelihood.

Or upgrade their rail system to take more ship containers and just bypass interstate trucking in California altogether.

I don’t know that that’s incompatible with what I suggested but, at least on paper, your idea sounds reasonable. We’ve had various special handling over the last couple of years to deal with the pandemic and whatnot. Lowering emission requirements - or whatever is blocking transit - for a year feels pretty do-able, if anyone in the White House knows Newsom’s home phone.

The Fed raised interest rates by another 0.75%.

For balance, Foxbusiness and the New York Post both inserted statements into their coverage saying that this move will increase chances of a recession.

Be back in a year.

I mean, of course it will may. How is that controversial?

I also quoted an analysis that said a recession is unlikely. How is the issue not controversial?

You do realize that John Oliver is a comedian, right?

!

So… what are you?

I mean, Oliver is a comedian but he did one of his things about how Subway franchises are a scam and there was nothing factually wrong in his segment, nor was his argument flawed.