Inorganic synthesis/consumption, and of course the “null hypothesis,” is that a natural substance that was subsequently synthesized and consumed was somehow responsible. It is worth noting that Binkley and Douglass failed to provide even one author who actually challenged this “null hypothesis” to back up their claim. What’s more, the referees failed to reject even one critique of this “null hypothesis.”
What’s your opinion about today’s government’s unilateral infringement of your right to produce and consume the chemicals that you need to survive, and that you believe should be free to all?
I am the father of four children. I don’t sell drugs, nor do I look for my source of medical care in the fictional drug companies.
I’ll take “fun with neural networks” for $500. This is like the uncanny valley of text, yet uncannily similar to some online conversations.