The stories are different, even significiant stories, and they are released but not often enough in English:
like 24 nuke-attache cases missing in Russia. (I am not an expert in this field of nukes, but Lebedev was to be charged if he didn’t have been killed in a helicopter accident.)
two guys took themselves into a nuke-submarine in England in December. Spent half an hour there and put on the alarm. That all that these peace-activists could do.
That I felt like a “hush-hush”. If only the terrorists would have known… 40 kg of plastics, gives a panic-wave, in any city, where nobody wants anything in their ports anymore.
Not just in a city like Portshmouth.
The nukes had been unharmed in the subs, but, The Most Honourable Reverend Blair would have had much to explain.
Yes, The Scotshman and some other “never-heard of papers” wrote about it. I got the news from a Finnish paper.
Now, here comes the problem, for any national 3-letter-guys (FSB, CIA etc.):
If You know, let’s say 4 languages and is cross-reading actively the news, I would say You get a picture.
I am able to read in 6 linguas, but I think it is a little bit rare.
But 90% of the people, from any country, are not on these boards, surfing in news, understand a jig what is sent from Bagdad, translated to e.g. Russian (maybe falsified, or let’s say “streamlined” etc.).
Within a decade You do not only have some crazy Finn here writing to You, there will be the guys from African countries, Asia much more represented, and all Muslim countries that are left.
But still, after that the main news goes as usual, for the 90%:
One lemming writes a story and the other lemmings copies and streamlines it.
I am still curious: Why do not the ABC, BBC and others, just make the same questions to the different countries representatives?
Just like take the foreign minister of Iraq and the equal from USA and give them ready written questions?
You say they would not agree to give their propaganda? Crap.
If the questions are written beforehand, and given the parties a chance to formulate some questions themselves, put the shit through the satellite etc. one in Bagdad or Paris, one in Washington.
You think one of the sides would refuse a prime-time hour. OK. Tell both, that if the other is absent, we give You the whole one hour of prime-time.
You think they would still refuse?
The media has incredible power, but it does not use it.
And do you think people would watch that program? All over the world!
And so on.
But these fucking lemmings with resources does nothing else than change the headline of the story that Reuters cables out.
Naturally if there is news like: “North-Korea has made an alliance with Saddam: We will attack South, if USA attacks Iraq. Syria and Iran is wagering, knowing they are the next!”, could and would not be hush-hushed anywhere.
But when the braking news are: “The president has a penis and he admits it”-style, the whole Europe is laughing.
Or did You see the writings on the walls in former Yugoslavia: “Monica, why did You not use Your teeth?”
It is true, now nobody is laughing, not even to the “braking news”. We are all f^=>()% worried!
The world is at a brink of deep depression, and some guy wants a war, on arguments that he could use against a dozen of countries.
And the news: “How stupid, ungrateful are not the French, Germans, the devil and his grandmother…”
Btw. Did anyone actually read the story? Not just the extracts it put in the OP?