Inspired by working with someone who has Perfect Pitch.

I’m currently in a production of La Boheme in Edmonton, and I share the dressing room with Etienne, the guy playing ‘Marcello’. It has been an absolute blast meeting him and working with him - fantastic voice, good actor, great personality, very good pianist and a pretty good guitar player. We have a piano and a guitar in our dressing room, and it has become our custom to jam around after we’re both finished out make-up calls.

The really interesting thing I wanted to tell you about him is that he has perfect pitch. It’s not that unusual for a singer/musician - I had a prof in university who read score like most people read a newspaper. Etienne is interesting because of how perfect pitch has shaped him as a player of pop music.

Essentially, when he hears a piece of music for the first time, there is no difference between his appreciation of it and his analysis of it, which in turn greatly accelerates his memorization of it. He simply hears the chords upon which a piece of music is based as distinctly as most people see colours, and as a result, he can remember a piece of music that he has only heard a couple of times. When I say remember, I mean well enough to fake his way through playing it. Inversions, unusual voicings, extensions, especially over diminished chords, are things that require a little more concentration for him, but Major and minor chords simply appear to him as very simple pieces of an easy jigsaw puzzle, or as words in a sentence.

Speaking as a more visual classical musician who prefers to read, it has been a remarkable couple of weeks. The fluency with which he plays and his ability to be a human iPod are just astonishing. At the post-reception [del]party[/del] production meeting in the chorus men’s dressing room on opening night, we were all playing and singing together whatever someone suggested. If the chord changes were hard, he’d graciously pass me the guitar and call them out to me. It didn’t seem to matter what style a piece came from - if he’d heard it a couple of times, he knew it.

I’m especially jealous of the memory - I’m at an age where it takes longer to memorize things, and I have to use a different approach. Once upon a time, anything I played more than ten times ended up memorized - now, I have to work at it.

I’d love to collaborate with him on a pop crossover project, but first I have to spend a year in the woodshed honing my ear just to play at his level. It has been an inspiring couple of weeks.

That is simply fascinating. That is a level of “musical vision” I can only imagine. Just think of the deep harmonic structures he must be able to internalize at levels I can only imagine.

So - is his favorite composer Beethoven? Does he favor chordally complex music vs. Bach-type harmonic stuff? How does his extra-sense ability manifest in what he listens to?

Thanks for sharing. I find his situation far more interesting vs. Oliver Sacks Musicophilia stories (he is becoming my old story-telling uncle, isn’t he?)…

I’m fascinated by anyone who can sight-read and play by ear with equal fluency. It’s as rare as perfect pitch in my experience. (I need to lubricate my sightreading to keep up with my daughter’s violin lessons; too many years of bluegrass sessions kind of gives me the lazy idea that I can figure out every song ever written on the fly…)

This is a second-hand story, but I knew the owner of a recording studio who has perfect pitch – he loved to unnerve bands by walking into sessions and discussing chord progressions of songs he was just hearing on the fly. Anyway, he once described an acquaintance who could, if you went to a piano and played ten random, discordant notes, would be able to name them in order without looking – but if you played him a classical piece he knew well in a different key, it would take him a while to recognize it.

Now that is amazing!

Are you sure you don’t mean “relative pitch”? Perfect pitch isn’t really that common.

When I was in music school, we had about 4 people with perfect pitch. Not surprisingly, they either played percussion or transposing instruments. Really helps timpanists with the tuning of the orchestra (but I’m sure you know that).

One guy picked exactly the notes in order over four octaves that my teacher played simultaneously. He said he first discovered perfect ptch when trying to play the saxophone. He had to switch to guitar/piano. When people requested a song like Wooly Bully in Eb, he could never play it except in it’s originally written key. To him, a new key was only a “wrong” key.

Congrats on the show and break a leg!

Well, I don’t know it :wink:

Can you expand on that please - why percussion? And what is a transposing instrument - something like piano which lays out all keys for easy access? And why would a saxophone be…an issue?..for a perfect-pitcher - why the need to switch?

It’s to do with notation. A transposing instrument is one that doesn’t play the pitch of the note written down. Saxophones for example come in three flavours/sizes which sound a differrent note when playing a written “C”. Tenor Bb, alto Eb and soprano err… something else.

Strictly speaking a guitar is a transposing instrument as it plays an octave lower than the notation. So as a guitarist, you only need to learn the treble clef :slight_smile:

Too late to edit but knowing this place someone is bound to point out… there are (at least) two other types of saxophone. As to why someone with perfect pitch would chose to play a *non-transposing instrument. I’d guess otherwise it would be rather confusing, read C hear Eb

*which is what I think Locrian meant to say.

When I was in school I took a class in ear training, which was basically sight-singing with solfege. About four guys in the class excelled at it. When the teacher asked who in class had perfect pitch, they all raised their hands. From then on he made them sing everything transpoded by a tritone. They became the worst students in the class.

Soprano is Bb, but sometimes C. There is also the baritone Eb. Actually…

Soprillo saxophone • Sopranino saxophone • C Soprano saxophone • Soprano saxophone • Mezzo-soprano saxophone • Alto saxophone • C melody saxophone • Tenor saxophone • Baritone saxophone • Bass saxophone • Contrabass saxophone • Subcontrabass saxophone

I once saw someone play a subcontrabass. It looked like someone ripped the plumbing out of a house.

Ah - I certainly know that sax’s come in different keys and all the complications that can result, but didn’t know that that type of instrument is referred to as a “transposing” instrument, but I get it. Ignorance fought; thanks.

Yes - it really appears the Perfect Pitch comes with a price: if you sense the “correctness” of the notes and their relationships to one another, then watching some less-attuned musical wannabee just “wave their hands” past a variation (“so you change keys - who cares? So it’s a Bb instrument and you are reading an F on the chart - what’s the big deal?”) you see as a Fundamental Difference™, then it will make for tough collaborations…

One guy in my college choir had perfect pitch. He didn’t have as much a problem with changing keys, but he did have a problem whenever we sharped or flatted. But he eventually learned to hear cents as well, and would tune his voice to match.

Plus, having a human pitch pipe is useful.

Well, the student said that both alto and tenor saxes were confusing before he knew he had perfect pitch. If the tune was in Eb, but the singer wanted C, he was fine on fingering but always thought he was playing the wrong notes. Hence, he switched
to piano and got used to it.

As far as percussionists, I was taught by one percussionist, mainly timpani with PP.
The first violinists tune the orchestra, but the timpanist traditionally tunes the first violinist, PP or not. Tuning a string is easy. Tuning a drum head that vibrates for days? That’s why I chose guitar. :smiley: