Iraq: Should the troops be withdrawn or drastically increased?

[BrainGlutton]

@Ryan_Liam

They weren’t legitimate to start from, those ‘indigenous Talibs’ were in fact trained and propped up by the ISI across the border into Pakistan.

ISI?

[Der_Trihs]

@BrainGlutton

ISI?

Inter-Services Intelligence of Pakistan.

[BrainGlutton]

@Der Trihs

Inter-Services Intelligence of Pakistan.

Why would they have wanted a Taliban regime in Afghanistan, considering that the Pakistani Taliban is giving the government no end of trouble? (See here.)

[Der_Trihs]

@BrainGlutton

Why would they have wanted a Taliban regime in Afghanistan, considering that the Pakistani Taliban is giving the government no end of trouble? (See here.)

Because they are as amoral and dumb as our own government ? How often have we subsidised people who turned against us ? I don’t know that they have; but I’ve been hearing they have for years, and that Wiki article mentions their alleged support for the Taliban as well.

[FRDE]

@BrainGlutton

Why would they have wanted a Taliban regime in Afghanistan, considering that the Pakistani Taliban is giving the government no end of trouble? (See here.)

The ISI were the conduit through which the USA supplied the Mujahadin, they have the contacts reaching into Afghanistan. Ten years of friendly relations with freedom fighters kicking out the Russians, don’t break down overnight.

I’m not sure that it is the Taliban who are giving the Pakistan government trouble, it is more tribal relatives of Afghanis who are pretty primitive.

That article is slightly spurious, the PPP is Bhutto’s party, they are not militant Moslems and Pakistan did not ‘change sides in the war on terror’, they (the government) have been pro-USA since the inception of Pakistan - it is to do with India being pro-USSR.

I see it as a spectrum with the Pakistani government at one end and the Taliban in Afghanistan and on the border at the other.

Also I rather doubt that the Taliban really understood what Al Qaeda were up to.

[BrainGlutton]

@BrainGlutton

There’s one in Iraq that matters? Or in the U.S.?

:dubious: I repeat.

[BrainGlutton]

@FRDE

. . . - it is to do with India being pro-USSR.

:dubious: Cite?

[FRDE]

@BrainGlutton

:dubious: Cite?

Not a perfect cite

Foreign relations of India

In 1962, India detected Chinese infiltration into Indian territory, which resulted in a brief war between the two. India has remained suspicious towards China since then. China also became a close ally of Pakistan, India’s neighbor, adding to the rift between the two. Even though, there has been a significant improvement in trade and diplomatic relations, India remains wary of China.

After the Sino-Indian War and the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, India made considerable changes to its foreign policy. It developed a close relationship with the Soviet Union and started receiving massive military equipment and financial assistance from the USSR. This had an adverse effect on the Indo-US relationship. USA saw Pakistan as a counter-weight to pro-Soviet India and started giving the former military assistance.

Basically it is the ‘my enemy’s enemy is my friend’ stuff, and Pakistan and India fell out with partition.
Here is a list of events
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=64

And this one dates it back to 1954
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=52
|America signed a military alliance with Pakistan in 1954 when Jawaharlal Nehru refused to cooperate with the USA. The Indian government was forced to expand contacts with China and the USSR.|

That is why Pakistan got spooked last year (?) when the USA started getting friendly with India and offering nuclear plants.

Pushing things, one could probably trace alliances right back to Partitian, India’s Congress party not being particularly USA acceptable, and Pakistan being a few miles away the USSR (Tajikstan)

Home | Maps.com

One could even venture as far as suggesting that the Pakistani military were geared towards ‘The Great Game’ - fear of Russia.