I’d assume a compression-ignition continuous-burn screw-type engine would be no dirtier…or cleaner…than a gas turbine.
Enter yourself to Wikipedia, you were already up to date with my “engineering”
Red Baron Windmill working prototype :
Andrew :D:D
- You don’t have a Wiki page.
- What the hell does that video have to do with the IRIS Engine?
1 So, according to you, then you should invent different new things, to do their prototypes, draw and shoot animations and videos … And what else should I be doing … post page in the wiki and build a windmill near your home … But I do not know if you’d be happy …
- This may be closer… This engine, in which the circular piston is not used which have been used for over 300 years. Here, the “piston” does not rubbing the cylinder wall. All reaction force is received by the sealed ball bearings, the lubricant inside. A friction piston seal only, which may be made ??of teflon and then not necessary at all engine lubricating oil …
No wonder you the efficiency of such a mechanism? I do not need to exchange oil…
Andrew:D:D
No.
First explain why you posted that video of a person holding a wing model out a car window in a thread about the IRIS Engine-What does the wing have to do with the engine?
Surely the end of life will not be reasoned with outdated IRIS : Rolleyes:
In other forum :
No thank you, finally, for a very specific question. Because of this specific not yet had my manual is not yet complete. But a few important tips I can already provide, for a good while I’m thinking about it already…
http://www.new4stroke.com/vent5.jpg
First units 10 and 15 miles is 16 km / h - 24 km / h or 4.5 m / s to 6.75 m / s
Now I think that should do the nozzle of the same size and calculations as in my post # 434.
Now this: the witrze 15 miles in the throat nozzle of dimensions we will have theoretical speed 167 miles (270 km / h) … the valve on the power of the fan is due at the speed we can get even theoretically about 20 Hp
to get the power from the electric generator, you must already quite large in size,. I could barely fit for him to die in his throat. and it completely obscured. It must therefore be outside the nozzle and be driven by a toothed belt from the propeller., and this is the biggest problem.
Same cones and these dimensions can all be done the hard styrofoam by cutting the thermal cutting CNC polystyrene. Most important thing is that the external surface of the cone must be round, full, of the 1000 mm dimension. Theses external surface of the throat must have the dimension. So that the air nozzle was skipping necessarily the way to the straight line, otherwise may not have a good performance at all. All these figures are just patterns of cones. The figure pointed to the red line is the nozzle look like on the outside.
http://www.new4stroke.com/Venturi1000a.jpg
Why is it important to air bypassing the nozzle on the outside was the shortest path in a straight line? not because I’m imagining that the venturi nozzle is so very close to collapse like a normal airplane wing over and over. its aerodynamics will surely like this over and over again folded wings. wing and best for low speed is the lower edge of a straight line. here shown theoretically how to wrap the wing sites. Now Lifting force of this wing will also “wrapped” inside, creating a negative pressure in the whole nozzle …
http://www.new4stroke.com/fold.jpg
It’s a rough …
Andrew:D
Since the IRIS Engine is the topic of this thread, could you please tell us what your current posts have to do with it?
Well, this a lunatic continuing science, here’s the project added to the venturi such an aircraft for flight litte 300 watts of power. Drew a venturi nozzle such as for example for driving a bicycle. I tried to accurately maintain scale drawings and nozzle. The nozzle has a dimension of 600 mm diameter and 2500 mm in length, and should be according to the calculations give the 300 watt …
You will agree with me that it does not look unreal :rolleyes:
Maybe that so few students on this board bought the plane, which is just an old record and added the venturi nozzles, so to show that they can, … and That Daedalus so he could follow the sun all the time to follow … without excessive risk of his strength or the fuel runs out …
Andrew:D
Devil is not so terrible as he is painted… 
Lest there be any lack of clarity…
Andrew
Changing the subject.
This engine, in which the circular piston is not used which have been used for over 300 years. Here, the “piston” does not rubbing the cylinder wall. All reaction force is received by the sealed ball bearings, the lubricant inside. A friction piston seal only, which may be made ??of teflon and then not necessary at all engine lubricating oil …
Andrew
No wonder you the efficiency of such a mechanism? I do not need to exchange oil…
Andrew:D:D
On-topic news: The corporate website link from the OP is down, and there has been no news about the engine for the past year.
It’s dead, Jim.
" Quot: BaLa, on 06 Sept 2013 - 02:31, said:
I notice that the difference is using pistons instead of valves. But I would like to know the benefits in terms of power, torque, durability and rpm."
a brief summary of:
So yeah … I made two prototype engines in such a system. First, this is my thesis at the Technical University. He had to show that the engine has the possibility to work at all. The assumption has done surprisingly well …
My second prototype, with many improvements done and its description and photos are on my website. The idea was it to work in the car Fiat 126 p on car races, which were held in Poland at the time. In my assumptions had he gives an output of around 100 horsepower at 10 000 revolutions. I made a prototype with its design and start-up to a satisfactory level of about 3 years (1000 days) View as a day of work takes a good mechanic replacing a head gasket does not, for example, in the “Lotus”, and you will know the approximate costs are such a prototype and its launch . …
All these costs were, funding of my personal funds …
But it was worth it. Flagellum yes - inventions also sometimes surprising, in a good way. Not everything new has to be wrong. IN THIS case in good page surprise was even beyond the scope of forecasts. Namely, how are the practice has shown a prototype of the engine has an output of around 250 horsepower at 10 000 revolutions … it is dwai know half times than the expected value. with such a large difference, finding out about it was a big threat to life … Here a little more fully described.
http://www.f1technic…t=4535&start=90
Due to this process, the engine is so big power from a relatively weak engine, its use in a racing car does not make sense, because the engine would have already collapsed at the start, using his full power. Also I did not want to risk because of this, the startup was repeatedly dismantled because some surprised me, not only when it comes to the same power. These repeated cutting weakened some of its elements, so they can no longer be too much to repeat … But at the moment, have the engine in ready to work … You can screw it to the 10 000 cycles. Unfortunately, I will not let the torque measurement, because it would crash ended his … Just a reality this time by two and a half times, and so exceeded the limit of sustainability, the design …
Strange that since 2005, despite the existence of this site, no one was willing to see the prototype at work … However, questions are asked, and sure. You maybe someone thinks that the data you publish false. . Really, please bear the costs of a visit, and so they will be much than the venue of the construction of its new prototype, and of course a few blunders that and I had … Operation of the engine, is in every respect a surprise in the right direction … Maybe instead of theorizing, it is worth it alone to see for yourself.
If it comes to SERVICE LIFE is sure it will be a lot more stable, because most emergency items in today’s engines are running timing and head gasket, In my design of these elements is not …
As regards the speed that is a structure that allows no low speed, up to 30 000 revolutions of the main shaft … crak timing schaft spins then only 15 000 cycles, while maintaining constant high precision charge exchange as the existing structure does not guarantee,
The engine has a huge advantage. The most hot item in the combustion chamber heats up, no more than 250 degrees Celsius. This is a huge advantage, because at this temperature does not occur in the most harmful NOx pollution, … Of course, the compression ratio can also pick up a lot …
Adding up all the advantages and possible regulatory tions, you will get about 50 % fuel efficiency, with the same parameters driving …
Well unless you do not believe the Displacement gives more power … :rolleyes:
Andrew
Well again, some of the atom. … It seems to me that Joseph Rotblat was the inventor of the atomic bomb and the first I became aware of the horrific possibilities. Because even as a foreigner was attached to the project Manchatan, after arranging the required formalities … The truth value of this claim due to the following publications and videos:
And some
Andrew
Since we veered off the subject in the OP some time ago, I’m closing this.
Colibri
General Questions Moderator