You’re never going to give a substantive answer to any question are you Kozmik?
Honestly, I don’t know what people are expecting. Are you actually thinking “This, this will be the question that gets Kozmik to give a detailed lucid explanation of how his system would work. Sure none of the previous 300 questions got anything but meaningless gibberish, cryptic one liners, and references to Tom Arnold movies nobody ever saw, but my question will get him to open up and respond coherently!”
I don’t even know if he believes his super-government really exists, or if he’s just speculating about how it might work.
you were correct that there was such a thing as “cosmic top secret” which is a NATO term. It seemed made up to me, and google led me to a lot of UFO sites, but I guess it does exist. So you were correct on a minor detail. Overall you’re system still isn’t even wrong.
… Wait.
In the Kozmik-verse, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were just *pretending *to be trying to dominate the world, while they were actually just following the directives of the Anarch? Does that mean that the efforts of the Allies were also just window-dressing, and several million people were killed for nothing?
I am now no longer amused, but actively angry and disgusted that **Kozmik **is proposing such a reprehensible concept.
What about the millions of people killed in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia? What about this letter to the editor published today in The New York Times about the war in Afghanistan? It gets deeper.
They are included in the “several million people” figure. What about them? Are their deaths as part of this infernal mummer-show by your Anarch somehow less reprehensible than those who died in combat?
And if you believe an op-ed letter saying we should get out of Afghanistan as quickly as possible somehow supports your delusions, you need professional help.
You never answer any questions nor do you pose any interesting questions. This thread, like every other thread you’ve participated in, has hopelessly floundered on the rocks of your inability to reason properly.
Well, sir, I disagreed with Brent Scowcroft who said, “There will always be war.”
If only that letter writer was at the town hall debate.
re: letter, “The war isn’t worth the death of one more of our brave soldiers.” I agree with that statement. Do you? How many people have to die in future wars, huh? The Onion even made a parody of it - Veterans of Future Wars.
What the everlasting fuck does that have to do with anything you have been going on about? Do you even read your own posts? Can you string two thoughts or statements together to expand on an idea?
I read your posts. You wrote that I implied that several million people were killed for nothing. The letter writer wrote that the war in Afghanistan is not worth the death of one more US soldier and, to expand on this idea - a question: Given that the deaths of 2,000 US solders were for something, would the death of “one more of our brave soldiers” be for nothing or for something?
So here we are again: the thread is going in circles. Kozmik, it looks like you are not willing or not able to answer direct questions. So I am going to instruct you to answer questions in a straightforward manner instead of playing games or referring back to older posts that don’t support your argument in the first place.
You were asked, for example, how this Anarch figure controls governments. Answer that question. Don’t like to other posts and don’t change the subject. The same goes for the questions about Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
If you’re just unable to answer these questions, I will close this thread soon and I may shut down similar discussions in the future because it will be that much more obvious that such threads are pointless.