No, I just want to know who you define as white. Are you capable of answering this question? It seems relevant when discussing a hypothetical “white genocide”- for example, if you can have 30% non-European ancestry and still be white, then cultural mixing is actually making lots and lots more white people- one could even say that there’s been a white explosion all over the west… centuries ago, white people were confined mostly to Europe- with the 70% European (or even better, 51% European) line to be counted as white, then white people keep covering more and more of the globe!
In fact, I like that definition- now there’s tons and tons of white people in places that never had them before.
If they say something deserving of mockery, then yes, I mock and make fun.
I’d love to see that- I really, really hope all your allies organize a resistance and publicly proclaim their allegiance to fighting the white genocide- then I know exactly which (inevitably tiny minority of) white people to mock!
Which ones? How does one know?
No, I’m actually right- most white people, certainly in America, have some non-zero portion of non-European ancestry. It would be helpful to know which ones you think are not really white based on how much non-European ancestry they have.
He must have cut and pasted from another thread and the C&P preserved the display text (with the ellipses) not the underlying URL. If you C&P you need to quote the thread and they use the full text.
Coming up at the end of the month, theHouston International Festival. This year’s honored country is Brazil. So the entertainment (on multiple stages) will feature groups of Samba dancers, demonstrations by Capoeira groups & individual Brazilian artists.
On most stages, we’ll have local & regional performers of all ethnicities–mariachis, Indian dancers, Irish dancers, country, rock & zydeco. Plus a few featured Stars; this year, we have Los Lobos, Bootsy Collins, Aaron Neville and The Wailers.
Oh, and there’s food. And stuff to buy–fine art to junk. It’s also fun watching my fellow Houstonians enjoy themselves downtown.
This year, I’ll have extra fun imagining certain folks blowing a gasket at all the White Genocide!
(Now back to the blah, blah, blah. Anybody who’s been convinced by the OP or his pal, please raise your hand!)
That still means “unpopular.” It means most people disagree with your conclusions and disapprove strongly of your attitude toward other people. That’s nothing close to criminalization or destruction. It’s not even unfair, though you might wish it were so you’d have a legitimate gripe.
It’s because your argument is laughably bad. 'You are literally claiming you’ve proved an international anti-white conspiracy based on about six comments about demographics and race, and several of them don’t even say what you claimed they said. That’s pretty pathetic.
The so-called white community already has been assimilating cultures for as long as this country has existed. In case you hadn’t noticed we’re a blend of German, Italian, Irish, Scotish, French, Spanish, Scandinavian etc. We didn’t come from Whitelandia. No such place.
White culture is a mutt culture. That’s why we should embrace more diversity, it makes the blend even stronger. Perhaps we’ll dispense with certain facets of the mix as the blending continues, but that’s always been part of the process. Sucks to be you if the facets dispensed with happen to be dear to you personally. C’est la vie.
I couldn’t give 2 shits about what happens in Japan or NIieria, racially speaking. that’s their business.
There are multiple Jewish cultures, and not to the point where there is one unified umbrella, there’s one general umbrella only because outside forces required Jews to remain a perpetual Other, which aids cohesiveness. There are, however, not multiple White cultures, because the modern “the White Race” is an invention of paranoid racists who feel that they’re culturally, economically and intellectually impotent, but can’t figure out a way to fix it, so they just look for scapegoats.
The idea that native Swede and an American share the same culture, is an absurdity. Or that Frenchmen are interchangeable with Romanians, since they’re both white. That there is a rough umbrella of western culture is fair, but that certainly doesn’t exclude non-Whites (however they’re defined)
You saying “my argument” is laughably bad doesn’t make it so. You have not refuted anything I have said. White genocide deniers are now reduced to denying there is any such thing as a White race, even though all we ever hear about is how this or that is “too white” and needs more “diversity.”
Now, it does not mean “unpopular” with most White people. It means "unpopular’ with elite whites who have the power to hand out rewards and punishments to regular whites. That’s all. Nothing more.
It’s not that there is no definition of “white people”, it’s that there are any number of definitions. Do you consider Turks to be “white”? How about Indians (dot, not feather)? Are Greeks white? Are Albanians and Bulgarians? Are Arabs?
Tell us which of those groups are or are not white.
First you say, White culture is a “mutt” culture, then you say we need more “diversity”.
Which is it? Are we diverse or not?
Now, which non-white populations do you believe need to be “improved” by being blended out of existence by forced assimilation with racially dissimilar colonial settlers occupying their land?
Suppose I say, you know the problem with Liberia is that it is just too black. A population of only black people is no good. They need more diversity.
It would be clear that you have some sort of problem with black people.
It is just as transparent when you demand white genocide.
It is racist to say that it’s important to make sure that the ‘white race’ - whatever the hell that is, stays white. Because only someone who thought race was important would say that.
It’s also racist to say that it’s important to make sure that the black race or the Jewish race remains black or Jewish or whatever.
It’s not racist to say that it’s imporant to make sure that no one - including ‘whites’ - is subject to genocide. But people mixing by choice isn’t genocide, it’s life.
I don’t have to provide you any definitions. The UN Convention on Genocide prohibits targeting “racial groups” for genocide.
Who’s White? is not a defense to genocide under international law.
Peter Sutherland has clearly revealed that ALL countries with a majority European-descended population must become “diverse”. That is a clear targeting under international law. Anti-whites cannot then turn around and claim not to know who is white after having deliberately targeted them for genocide. It doesn’t work that way.
“But if the European example is much poorer in terms of the integration of workers into their society, in terms of their getting jobs, that is related to the fact that the United States or Australia and New Zealand are migrant societies and therefore accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others, which is precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.” -Peter Sutherland, UN Migration Chief
The fact that you continue to deny White genocide in face of all the evidence just shows that you are denying it because you support it and want it to continue.
They’re not mutually exclusive- white culture, if it even exists, is certainly a very mixed culture- and it’s very reasonable to claim that adding more diversity would make it stronger.