Just tell them that the concept of “race” is a social, rather than a scientific concept.
Others in this thread have already pointed out that what you consider to be “race mixing” has gone on all over the world.
Yes, countries like Japan have racist immigration policies. Yes, those policies are wrong. But are you seriously claiming that those policies are promulgated in order to commit genocide against the “white race”?
The problem is that more and more white people are listenign to this ‘anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white’ stuff, and, we need much more than just plain ridicule to counter these characters. We need effective repliers and counter points to neutralize their message, because they are gaining more power everyday. Now, IF they get enough power some day, and their white people accepts the notion that ‘anti-white’ elites attempted to ‘genocide’ their race, then there will definitely be genocide tribunals…I mean just look at history…this kind of stuff can develop into tribunals very very quickly. And those of us who have been very vocal about demanding and supporting the destruction of white borders might be dragged into those tribunals. Now do you understand why we have to work on this???
I’m always at a loss against this kind of argument because it’s just so ABSURD to put that much stock in being “white”. Hell, I’m half-Italian, so I wouldn’t have even BEEN white less than a century ago. If the thing you’re most worried about is dilution of your racial purity, you’ve got bigger problems than some kind of UN-promoted mass miscegenation.
My impression is that so far the creators of that drivel are willing to confuse concepts like race with culture. Not a new thing, even the most notorious genocide organized by the Nazis depended on the crazy declaration that cultures in Europe (most of them made of white people) were just the same as races! So it did not matter if a Jew or a Slav was as white as snow, they were the wrong “race” and so they had to go.
But you really think the makers of those screeds would react to intelligent ideas? Dream on, just remember that now even most conservatives do not give the time of day to the people that posted those “arguments”, I would had been worried a few decades back when many politicians did embrace them; now, anyone that follows that rhetoric is dismissed even at the political level. In other words, the intelligent thing is to dismiss it as the irrelevant silliness it has become.
But if there is anything needed to counter those silly arguments, one needs to point out that many Hispanics and other immigrants are also white; also: genetically speaking race divisions are dumb, and it is really dumb to claim that the UN and other organizations are concentrating or just referring to conflicts of one race against another there, otherwise it would had been impossible to declare a genocide in Rwanda as one group of black people (Hutus) did attempt to kill another (Tutsies), those declarations by the UN and others are indeed referring to cultures, the race of the people being eliminated is not really the main reason given for the heinous act as many of the organizers of genocides in the past could tell you.
As the Rwanda example shows, the ones that made that “anti-white” message do not have a clue of what is a genocide.
I’m not promulgating it…The white supremacists are, and they are gaining adherents every day for god’s sake. I have used the ‘race is a social construct’ schtick on these guys. You don’t understand…They are much more eloquant and sophisticated than we have thought possible. They answer this one by saying:
“Race is a social construct.
Should ALL and ONLY Black countries be flooded with hundreds of millions of non-Blacks who are then force assimilated into the Black population because “Race is a social construct”???
You anti-Whites ONLY ever argue for this to be done to EVERY White country and ONLY White countries. You are demanding and justifying the GENOCIDE of my people.”
Or…
“The UN Genocide Law, SPECIFICALLY recognizes the existence of RACE as an ‘Identifiable Group’, to prevent what anti-Whites like you are doing right now.
Your attempt to dehumanize my people, the White race, by saying we are a social construct and we do not exist, will not work.
Dehumanization is one of the 8 steps of genocide.
No one is going to Africa or Asia and telling the people there, Blacks or Asians do not exist. Anti-Whites are only doing this in all White countries and only White countries.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”
They have pulled some other ones on me, and they just keep on repeating these damn point over and over…It’s very frustrating. We need NEW points to destroy their white supremacist points.
“Genocide” means killing people. White people are not being killed, as a rule. If some of them, or all of them, choose to have less-white children, no population is being wiped out.
I think your problem, OP, is that you’re engaging them in the first place. Ridicule IS exactly what needs to be applied. Their ideas are ridiculous. Their philosophy is absurd. They don’t DESERVE to be engaged seriously.
There really IS no rational way to answer their screeds that is going to convince them they’re wrong. It’s impossible to rationally dissuade someone from an idea that they did not arrive at rationally.
Not my impression when I look at history, it may be that more whites are listening, but the overwhelming evidence out there is that most conservative groups do not even give the time of day to the ones that follow that twaddle. Far from it, they are nowadays metaphorically tarred and feathered in public by the conservatives themselves when someone appears spouting that stuff.
So, the only immigration that has happened in the history of the world is non-whites migrating into “white” countries? Ask what the Native Americans, South Africans, aboriginal Australians, etc., etc., etc., think about that.
Then those are not your friends, regarding social media the solution is the same as in the tangible social networks: shun those fellows, get better friends. In the end most of those will open their mouths in the real world and will even be shunned for real by even the conservative groups that they belong to.
I have heard this one as well but they are quick to point out that there is massive non-white on white violence in white countries. For example, they will reply:
“Anti-racists Want Lower White Birth Rates
39,000 White Women raped by Black men annually
White Women Therefore Have Lower Birth Rates
Raping White Women is Part of White Genocide
Anti-racist is a codeword for Anti-White”
Or…
“Anti whites keep repeating the ridiculous canard that there is no White genocide simply because there are not large numbers of White people being slaughtered.
In the US annually alone:
37000 white women are brutally raped and sexually assaulted by Black men alone.
Over 650,000 Whites suffer serious violent crimes from Black people.
It is totally unsafe for White people to travel in cities which our own people constructed without being violently assaulted. This is White Genocide!”
These goofs have an answer for every one of our anti-racist points
This is a very very common anti-racist point that used to work on the whites…but now they reply with something like the following:
“With this kind of silly comment you aren’t denying the existence of white genocide…Rather, you simply justifying white genocide. What we are telling you anti-white freaks is that genocide is universally wrong, and for us more specifically, the modern system of white genocide is just as wrong. STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY WHITE GENOCIDE”
Oh, come on. You quoted them above that all this evil crap was only happening to white people. There are no “irrefutable facts” here, just huge piles of utter bullshit.
I’m looking for ammunition…of which I have found none yet. But keep trying…offer up some more counter points that we can throw at these whites. But they have to be NEW.
No need for that when even the only ones capable of making a difference (politicians) are tarring them, perhaps that should be the POINT, it is new as in reality, no matter what they claim, it is their points the ones that have less support as time goes by.