Even as little 30 years ago (in America), these “white genocide” arguments might have gotten a little traction- there were still lots and lots of white people who didn’t know or associate closely with non-white people, and they might be susceptible to believing that the increasing influence of non-white people is bad for white people. But nowadays? There are very few white Americans who don’t count at least one or two non-white people among their close friends and family. The “white genocide” just isn’t a credible threat when there are lots of mixed and non-white people around you that you love and trust. People put friends and family ahead of strangers- therefore most white people value their non-white friends and family far more then “white people” in general, or some vague concept of “whiteness”.
I believe people who focus on race are by and large clueless, petty, and unintelligent people. Peole who try to prevent racial mixing are racist. That doesn’t mean that not mixing is racist - you can breed with whoever the hell you want to, I don’t give a shit.
I still have no idea what it means. Please tell me again.
Who are my anti-racist friends? You seem to know a lot about them - can you please identify them and describe the actions that you are referring to.
NOT IF THE WORDS ARE IN ALL CAPS.
You equate being forced to be near a black person as genocide and wonder why everyone knows you’re a racist? Really?
Bah, no time for the rest of yuor nonsense. Gotta go to a meeting. There might be ablack person in there, pray for me.
I just want to know who you think is white, that’s all. Before we get into genocide and international law, WHO DO YOU THINK IS WHITE? It’s a simple question, and if you can’t answer it, then you have no basis even to begin an argument.
You should turn him to to the international police then.
Right, they’re exactly the same. Because somehow I, and my friends who live in the area, missed the forced roundups and relocation of local white people.
Once again you are redefining words to mean something entirely different, because it’s the only way you can remotely come up with an argument. You need “genocide” to mean “moving to the suburbs” but still retain the horror of the Rwandan slaughter.
But hey! I think I’ll decide that “rape” means “to disagree strongly with”. My God, you’re raping me! You’re raping everyone in this thread! You’re a monster!
Shut up, you serial rapist. Still redefining words.
By the way, I missed this the first time around, but did you really check the link you posted under the words “gang raped”?
You have - presumably inadvertently - posted a link to a story referencing Jimmy Savile and the Haut de la Garenne children’s home on Jersey. Which means that, in a link that was supposed to show what animals non-white immigrants were, we got two of the most horrific cases of multiple child abuse in UK history, one involving a man so white he was practically albino and the other taking place on Jersey, which is about as pure white as you can get. Native-born white people, and yet both cases involve decades of child abuse affecting hundreds of children, aided and abetted by the (white) authorities. If you’d managed to get a mention of the Catholic paedophilia scandal you’d have hit the trifecta.
Look, everyone, what savages these pure-bred whites are! Here are not the two or three child victims that White Survivalist mentioned but hundreds upon hundreds of them, many of them helpless and abandoned by the system! Surely we must segregate these “whites” away for the good of society, and not let them interbreed with us good decent folk!
It’s sad when I can make a stronger argument than yours as a joke.
I have quoted the UN Convention on Genocide as well as the increasingly influential definition of the founding scholar of Genocide Studies.
Now, I have provided evidence of a conspiracy to exterminate White people that you continue to ignore because you want the genocide to continue. You don’t want White people talking about White genocide because you support it and you don’t want Whites to do anything about it.
Ok, first of all, if you’re going to insult me you’re going to have to do better than that.
Beyond that, no, looking at pictures it’s hardly obvious that Zimmerman is “non-white” while Santiago is “white”. Their skin tone isn’t too different other than that Zimmerman obviously spends far more time in the sun. Also, both had one parent who was an Anglo and one who was Hispanic.
Beyond that, did you actually bother reading the article you linked to and looking at the pictures.
Here’s the article and right below the picture of Antonio are his parents and you’ll notice that his father is vastly darker than most Hispanics. In fact people will notice that the skin tone of Luis Santiago is almost exactly the same as the African-American man who murdered little Antonio.
In short, you’re upset over the death of a child who’s father was very obviously “not white” so then shouldn’t Antonio also be considered a non-white.
As to Zimmerman, no, it’s hardly obvious that he’s “non-white”. He’s no darker than most Portuguese-Americans, Sicilian-Americans, and Greek-Americans I’ve met.
Do you consider them “non-whites”?
It’s also worth noting when arrested by the police on both occasions in the reports he was referred to as “caucasian.”
If present trends continue, by 2050 the white population of the U.S. will no longer be a majority of the total population, but, it still will be larger than it is now.
How is that “genocide”?
Bullshit.
Quote exactly where in that article Ron Unz claims that whites only represent “20% of the student population” of Harvard.
I used to live next to Harvard and went out with a girl from Harvard and that’s demonstrably false.
Oh, you’re spelling it wrong. It’s White GeNOcide, according to various sites Google brings up.
But I didn’t spend time there. Instead, I read what the SPLC has to say about a recent White genocide protest. Yup, the Klan, neo-Nazis & Aryan Nation were behind it.
You are using an overly narrow definition of the term genocide that ignores the both international law and contemporary genocide scholarship. Settler colonialism, especially when accompanied by large-scale violence against natives, is genocide.
The grooming gang problem in the UK is almost exclusively a Pakistani problem. The government [covered it up](Revealing the fears over the racial element to the abuse, a 2010 report from the Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board said the crimes had ‘cultural characteristics … which are locally sensitive in terms of diversity’, but warned of ‘sensitivities of ethnicity with potential to endanger the harmony of community relationships’.) because the crimes had “‘cultural characteristics … which are locally sensitive in terms of diversity’, but warned of ‘sensitivities of ethnicity with potential to endanger the harmony of community relationships”, according to a 2010 Children’s Bureau report.
Now, the government not only let these crimes continue rather than taking decisive action, they continue to hand out passports to massive numbers of Muslim immigrants.
That is complicity in genocide under Article IV section (c) of the UN Convention on Genocide.
It does not matter that “white men rape too.” If it did, there would be no such thing as genocide ever, because any nation will have its share of native perpetrators.
This is exactly how the $PLC and other anti-whites, oh I mean, “anti-racists” prevent any concerns that Whites have about anything from being discussed in public.
Its a great big anti-white circle.
Any group that advocates for White people is a “neo-Nazi”. That way, anything the group ever says about anything can be simply dismissed out of hand, without regard to the merits.
That way, whites are forever silenced and excluded from any sort of participation in society.
Neat trick.
No it isn’t. It just seems that way because people mistake Jews for whites. Direct quote from the article:
“In fact, Harvard reported that 45.0 percent of its undergraduates in 2011 were white Americans, but since Jews were 25 percent of the student body, the enrollment of non-Jewish whites might have been as low as 20 percent, though the true figure was probably somewhat higher.51 The Jewish levels for Yale and Columbia were also around 25 percent, while white Gentiles were 22 percent at the former and just 15 percent at the latter. The remainder of the Ivy League followed this same general pattern.”
Notice nothing is being said about this in the mainstream media. Gee,I wonder why.
No it won’t. Not unless whites start marrying each other and having white babies.
You can quote The Collected Works of Emily Dickinson if you like. You failed to demonstrate that the actions you are complaining about fulfill the definitions. In fact you hardly tried. You had Lemke saying “Genocide … is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.” You didn’t show any coordinated plan intended to annihilate white people. And elsewhere you argued that you didn’t even need to demonstrate that there was a plan because it’s still genocide if it doesn’t happen on purpose. That contradicts the widely understood meaning of genocide in a very obvious way and it totally contradicts Lemke, so you undermined your own citations and arguments in the process. You didn’t show anything that meets the UN Convention’s definition either. You made some noises about white people South Africa (where I am sure black people are getting killed more often than white people at any rate) but didn’t show how that illustrates any larger issue related to white people and you offered a weird tangent into interracial rapes that appeared to show black women get raped more often than white women.
Hmmm… I’m a bit surprised by this argument which struck me as really familiar.
Then I remembered Formulaone’s first post on this thread.
Now, that is a really weird coincidence particularly since I’ve never seen anyone use such a defense for anti-white racism before other than from the two of you.
Now, both of you had accounts created within the last 24 hours and haven’t posted on any other thread other than this one and you didn’t start posting until formulaone had been warned to stop. Since then you’ve gone on a posting spree while formulaone is MIA.
Do you two know each other? Were you one of his racist friends who’d come up with such persuasive arguments that he felt the need to start the thread on this site to get arguments he could use against you?
That fellow holding himself out as the father knows perfectly well he is not the biological father, and so do you.
You really should consider getting your eyes checked. As the father himself stated, the little one “had the bluest eyes.”
Come on, now. You know that dude isn’t that baby’s father.
Way darker than any of those groups. Besides, his facial features show clear African admixture from his black great-grandmother.
Here’s the SPLC page on the Aryan Nation.
I’m quite white & I take part in society. In fact, I just made a small contribution to the SPLC.
I’ll check back in with you White Genocide Deniers later.
The point is you are not allowed any political representation whatsoever. There are political advocacy organizations for blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews, even though the latter two groups are wealthier and more “privileged” than Whites, but White advocacy organizations are silenced and excluded.
I guess that’s what you anti-whites call “equality.”
What? They have roving groups of Pakistani teenagers who spot victims with bad haircuts, hold them down and give them a proper trim, perhaps with some conditioner, and let them go with some skin care advice? That doesn’t seem like such a bad idea, really.