According to Dr. John Gray (the Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus guy), Cuba has the same kind of Immunization schedule for children as the US, yet has a low incidence of Autism due to one vital difference…cuban children are not given a dose of tylenol to alleviate the fever from the immunization.
ISTM that saying the only differnce between Cubans and Americans is that they don’t take tylenol to break immunization induced fevers and that’s why they don’t have as many Autistic kids as the US, has at least one false premise, at least one incorrect assumption and at least one giant leap in logic.
Not the vaccine…the tylenol to stop the fever.
Apparently, you got to let the body cook that virus out of the system…it is a vital procedure that needs to be seen through to the end, naturally.
Is there a higher rate of autism with certain races; are white children in the U.S. disproportionately representative of the autistic population? How do they stack up compared to Hispanic children in the U.S.?
Everything I have ever read about diagnosing autism says that there is no medical test for it and that it’s diagnosed based on behavior. How does that work in the womb?
It’s obviously not fully understood, but lots of data is emerging showing that the issues probably start in the womb.
Postmortem brain tissue analysis showing incorrect brain development in some areas.
Here’s another showing connection to amniotic fluid:
“Boys diagnosed with autism and related disorders had, on average, raised levels of testosterone, cortisol and other hormones in the womb, according to analyses of amniotic fluid that was stored after their mothers had medical tests during pregnancy.”
Here’s another with brain scans showing differences: https://www.nature.com/news/brain-scans-spot-early-signs-of-autism-in-high-risk-babies-1.21484
Everyone wants an in-depth debunking. They’re fun to read and fun to write. Everyone wants someone to go up the ass of some false claim, or system of false claims, to ferret out exactly how the whole thing falls down.
What’s more, people seem to assume that there’s some nugget of truth there, a gem hidden away in the mountain of shit. People seem resistant to the idea that something which looks like pure shit could be pure shit.
Well, this is pure shit. There’s nothing there: It’s a statement so divorced from reality the only proper response is to say that it is completely wrong.
It is completely wrong. There is nothing else to say about that statement.
As for the broader claim, the existing research debunks it as well: If two things, such as getting a shot and getting Tylenol, always or almost always occur together, the statement that some other thing doesn’t correlate with one of those things, such as getting a shot, means it also doesn’t correlate with the other thing, such as getting Tylenol. That follows directly from the definition of correlation.
I’m kinda confused by your post. I asked the question to bring up the possibility that the rates of autism in the U.S. are higher than in Cuba due to more white people living in the U.S. Obviosly this is idle speculation.
Here is an article on the prevalence of autism by race. This one states that it’s more prevalent among whites than other ethnic groups, but that there no known genetic reason for this to be true.
By that reasoning, any immunization which doesn’t produce a fever wouldn’t work; this would include both induced immunization (vaccines) and those due to encountering the bug in the wild.
The fever is one of many symptoms of the immune system going on overdrive (i.e., the immunization is working); it is not the only one, nor is it the mechanism by which the bugs are being killed. Giving antipyretics to feverish patients does not prolong the illness; giving them to someone who’s been vaccinated does not cause a secondary effect which they wouldn’t cause if the reason for the fever was a random bug instead of an injected one.
Re. the original question, to obtain a correlation, one needs more than two points; or rather, two points can always be forced into a perfect correlation. There’s almost 200 countries in the world, dude picked only two and then grabbed one of hundreds of differences between the two to blame for autism. Why not blame capitalism vs communism, free market vs directed economy, obesity epidemic vs limited diet?
Is there? More white people in the US, I mean. Is this Cuban-American white or Hispanic?
Are there more white people in The U.S. than in Cuba? Of course. There are more people of pretty much every race/diversity in the U.S. than in Cuba. It almost seems like you are trying to twist my post into some racism-tinged thing. It’s not disputed that black people run a higher risk of sickle-cell anemia in the U.S. (or at least it wasn’t last time I heard anything), for example. I wondering if white people (with no or negligible Cuban heritage) had statistically higher incidence of autism per capita than native born Cuban people.