This is a serious inquirey.
I’ve been thinking about it for some time and studied aynotomical models. Have not found a clue of an answer out there. I am not planning to do this but I am curious why it is not commonly discribed or practiced.
**In a male, is it possile thru surgery to create a vaginal canal without loosing the penis? **
The testicle sack can easily be inverted and pass thru the same passage that accomates the female vaginal canal. Testes if saved can be tucked upward out of the way. This much is easily explored by any male alone without surgery - as long as the penis is perfectly flacid. A male can make modest vaginal insertions thru the testical sack using a small phalic object. No need to break the skin! I am surprise there is not referance to this practice that I have ever seen.
The main obsticle to male vaginal penitration during sexaual encounter is (DAH!) the erect penal bulb. The bulb, aligned by a pair of crus tissue uses the center pelvic area (vaginal opening) as a swivel socket for thrusting. For for bi-gender sexual performance, the penis bulb would need to surgically split and reshaped, protecting the uerethra and other plumbing. I don’t think any pelvic bone inhibits this change. The analgus structures in male and female have so many similarities it seem at least possible to consider creating this opening. The penis might be able retain much of its structure and still allow scrotum-lined penitration - perhaps really intense penetration thru the erect penal base. Add direct stim of the prostate, I dont know why we are waiting. Is there something I missing?
I know, I know. There is another more common and easier route taken this end. But: given the variety of gender variants, transgenders, reassignments, SRS, genital mods, designer genders out there, it seems that this variation has not been explored as far as I can Google.
Since you’re starting with a Guy, it seems more likely (and more appropriately) Snips and Snails and Puppy-Dog Tails
(Or whatever your local version is. I thought everybody said it this way, until recently.)
Vertbridge
If the goal is to leave a fully functional penis, the penile inversion method is clearly out. But, vaginoplasty can be done using a length of colon to create the neovagina. But, OTTOMH, this still involves using the glans to make a neoclitoris.
Tucked testes would still pump out testosterone. But, the increased heat from being in the abdomen would result in fertility problems if not outright sterility.
This strikes me as the biggest problem. Penile lengthening surgeries involve detaching this part of the penis, and pulling it forward and upward. The rate of complications, and patient dissatisfaction is high. A penisbulbostomy would have much greater problems.
For what it’s worth, I’ve seen an example in a porno magazine. The subject had a surgically created vagina and a penis above that. It’s rather puzzling, as though the fellow couldn’t fully commit to the change.
I think the idea is being missed here… If the Penis is kept intact and a vaginal is created out if the colon with vaginal lips created by the scrotum, why would you need a clitoris?
You can also free the penis from it’s suspensory ligament, vertically slice through the scrotum, and then pull the penis down through that space, leaving an orifice for a vagina to be made. Essentially you’re moving the penis out of the way. Sure it’ll be hanging straight down at the very bottom or underneath the scrotal area instead of the top and using for sex would be more difficult, but you’d now have a vagina in the correct position and a penis that won’t be in the way.
Testicular Cancer Risk Factors | Risks For Testicular Cancer
" One of the main risk factors for testicular cancer is a condition called cryptorchidism , or undescended testicle (s). This means that one or both testicles fail to move from the abdomen (belly) into the scrotum before birth. Males with cryptorchidism are many times more likely to get testicular cancer than those with normally descended testicles."